Literature DB >> 1945642

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure facilitates extubation of very low birth weight neonates.

R D Higgins1, S E Richter, J M Davis.   

Abstract

A prospective randomized trial was performed in 58 neonates comparing nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) vs oxyhood following extubation of neonates weighing less than 1 kg. All neonates had been ventilated for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome for at least 24 hours and weighed less than 1 kg at the time of extubation. Clinical criteria for elective extubation included improving pulmonary status, fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) less than or equal to 0.35, mean airway pressure less than or equal to 7 cm H2O, ventilator rate less than or equal to 20 breaths per minute, and weight at least 80% of birth weight. Informed consent was obtained and neonates were randomized to NCPAP or oxyhood following extubation. Success was defined as remaining free of additional ventilatory support for at least 5 days. Failure criteria included FIO2 greater than or equal to 0.60 to maintain pulse oximetry greater than or equal to 93%, PaCO2 greater than or equal to 60 mm Hg, pH less than or equal to 7.23, or moderate to severe apnea. Results demonstrate that 22 (76%) of 29 neonates were successfully extubated to NCPAP while only 6 (21%) of 29 were successfully extubated to oxyhood (P less than .0001). There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Of the 23 neonates who failed oxyhood, 21 were then given a trial of NCPAP and 58% (12/21) remained extubated. Data indicate that using selected clinical criteria for elective extubation of neonates weighing less than 1 kg, NCPAP facilitates successful extubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1945642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  11 in total

Review 1.  Continuous distending pressure.

Authors:  C Morley
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 2.  Weaning from assisted ventilation: art or science?

Authors:  S K Sinha; S M Donn
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 3.  CPAP review.

Authors:  Olie Chowdhury; Catherine J Wedderburn; Donovan Duffy; Anne Greenough
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 4.  Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: what do we know in 2007?

Authors:  Louise S Owen; Colin J Morley; Peter G Davis
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Randomised trial of elective continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compared with rescue CPAP after extubation.

Authors:  N J Robertson; P A Hamilton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  Unsynchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation to prevent extubation failure in neonates: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mala Kumar; Shalini Avasthi; Shruti Ahuja; G K Malik; S N Singh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  Nasal deformities resulting from flow driver continuous positive airway pressure.

Authors:  N J Robertson; L S McCarthy; P A Hamilton; A L Moss
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.747

8.  Nasal high frequency ventilation in neonates with moderate respiratory insufficiency.

Authors:  M van der Hoeven; E Brouwer; C E Blanco
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.747

9.  Randomised, controlled trial of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the extubation of infants weighing 600 to 1250 g.

Authors:  P Davis; R Jankov; L Doyle; P Henschke
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.747

10.  Application of nasal continuous positive airway pressure to early extubation in very low birthweight infants.

Authors:  B H So; M Tamura; J Mishina; T Watanabe; S Kamoshita
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.747

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.