Literature DB >> 8120721

Randomized, controlled trial of nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in the extubation of very low birth weight infants.

D J Annibale1, T C Hulsey, P C Engstrom, L A Wallin, B L Ohning.   

Abstract

We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine whether extubation of very low birth weight infants was facilitated by the use of nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Eligible infants included patients weighing 600 to 1500 gm at birth who required tracheal intubation within 48 hours of birth and who met specific predetermined criteria for extubation by day 14 of life. We also sought to determine whether varying the duration of nasopharyngeal CPAP influenced the likelihood of successful extubation. Infants underwent random assignment to receive nasopharyngeal CPAP until resolution of lung disease (n = 40), 6 hours of nasopharyngeal CPAP (n = 42), or oxygen supplementation delivered by hood (n = 42). Extubation failure was predefined as a requirement for > or = 80% oxygen, pH < or = 7.20, severe apnea, or predefined clinical deterioration, and extubation success was predefined as the ability to remain free of a requirement for mechanical ventilation for 7 days and a 66% reduction in the need for supplemental oxygen. Each group was similar with regard to race, sex, and birth weight. Extubation was successful in 62%, 61%, and 60% of infants. After stratification by birth weight, there were no significant differences in the rates of successful extubation among the treatment groups. We conclude that nasopharyngeal CPAP does not improve the likelihood of successful extubation of very low birth weight infants who are ready for extubation within the first 2 weeks of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8120721     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(94)70375-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  8 in total

Review 1.  Weaning from assisted ventilation: art or science?

Authors:  S K Sinha; S M Donn
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 2.  CPAP review.

Authors:  Olie Chowdhury; Catherine J Wedderburn; Donovan Duffy; Anne Greenough
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 3.  Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: what do we know in 2007?

Authors:  Louise S Owen; Colin J Morley; Peter G Davis
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Randomised trial of elective continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compared with rescue CPAP after extubation.

Authors:  N J Robertson; P A Hamilton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Unsynchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation to prevent extubation failure in neonates: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mala Kumar; Shalini Avasthi; Shruti Ahuja; G K Malik; S N Singh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 6.  Advances in neonatal conventional ventilation.

Authors:  S K Sinha; S M Donn
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  Randomised, controlled trial of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the extubation of infants weighing 600 to 1250 g.

Authors:  P Davis; R Jankov; L Doyle; P Henschke
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 8.  Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates.

Authors:  A G De Paoli; P G Davis; B Faber; C J Morley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.