Literature DB >> 21287362

The prognoses of metaplastic breast cancer patients compared to those of triple-negative breast cancer patients.

Soo Youn Bae1, Se Kyung Lee, Min Young Koo, Sung Mo Hur, Min-Young Choi, Dong Hui Cho, Sangmin Kim, Jun-Ho Choe, Jeong Eon Lee, Jung-Han Kim, Jee Soo Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Jung-Hyun Yang.   

Abstract

Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) is a rare, heterogeneous breast cancer characterized by admixture of adenocarcinoma with metaplastic elements, low hormone receptor expression, and poor outcomes. The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 47 MBC patients and 1,346 invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) patients. Two hundred eighteen of the IDC patients were triple-negative (TN-IDC) for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (ER-/PR-/HER2-). Patients were surgically treated at the Samsung Medical Center between 2005 and 2009. The MBC patients presented with a larger tumor size, lower lymph node involvement, higher histological and nuclear grades, higher triple negativity (ER-/PR-/HER2-) and higher p53, CK5/6, and EGFR expressions compared with those of the IDC group. However, there were no significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics between MBC and TN-IDC. During the follow-up period (median duration of 30.3 months, range 2.6-56.3 months), seven (14.9%) MBC patients, and 98 (7.1%) IDC patients had disease recurrence. The three-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 78.1% in the MBC group and 91.1% in IDC group (P < 0.001). The three-year DFS rate was not significantly different between the MBC and TN-IDC groups (78.1 vs. 84.9%, P = 0.114). However, in patients with lymph node metastasis who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, the three-year DFS rate was 44.4% in the MBC group and 72.5% in the TN-IDC group (P = 0.025). The authors found that MBC had a poorer clinical outcome than did IDC. In breast cancer patients with nodal metastasis, MBC had a poorer prognosis than did TN-IDC, despite adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21287362     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1359-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  57 in total

Review 1.  Metaplastic breast cancer: clinical overview and molecular aberrations for potential targeted therapy.

Authors:  Sausan Abouharb; Stacy Moulder
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Whole-Exome Sequencing of Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma Indicates Monoclonality with Associated Ductal Carcinoma Component.

Authors:  Bracha Erlanger Avigdor; Katie Beierl; Christopher D Gocke; Daniel J Zabransky; Karen Cravero; Kelly Kyker-Snowman; Berry Button; David Chu; Sarah Croessmann; Rory L Cochran; Roisin M Connolly; Ben H Park; Sarah J Wheelan; Ashley Cimino-Mathews
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Comparative Effectiveness of an mTOR-Based Systemic Therapy Regimen in Advanced, Metaplastic and Nonmetaplastic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Reva K Basho; Clinton Yam; Michael Gilcrease; Rashmi K Murthy; Thorunn Helgason; Daniel D Karp; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kenneth R Hess; Vicente Valero; Constance Albarracin; Jennifer K Litton; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; David Hong; Razelle Kurzrock; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Filip Janku; Stacy L Moulder
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-23

4.  Co-expression of EGFR and CK5/6 in primary squamous cell carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Xinke Zhang; Jiehua He; Mingtian Yang; Jun Tang; Xing Li; Hailin Tang; Xiaoming Xie
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Breast Carcinosarcomas.

Authors:  Savaş Yakan; Erdem Sarı; Nazif Erkan; Mehmet Yıldırım; Enver Vardar; Ali Coşkun; Durmuş Ali Çetin; Nükhet Eliyatkın
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2014-07-01

Review 6.  Metaplastic Carcinoma of the Breast Is More Aggressive Than Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Study From a Single Institution and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Dima El Zein; Melissa Hughes; Shicha Kumar; Xuan Peng; Tolutope Oyasiji; Hossam Jabbour; Thaer Khoury
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Prognostic value of ERCC1 mRNA expression in non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and gastric cancer in patients from Southern China.

Authors:  Qiuhua Deng; Haihong Yang; Yongping Lin; Yuan Qiu; Xia Gu; Ping He; Meiling Zhao; Hui Wang; Yunjian Xu; Yunen Lin; Juhong Jiang; Jianxing He; Jeff X Zhou
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: Clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes with long-term follow up.

Authors:  Aron Gortman; Noel J Aherne; Justin Westhuyzen; Julan V Amalaseelan; Patrick M Dwyer; Matthew Hoffmann; Andrew T Last; Thomas P Shakespeare
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01

9.  Early and Locally Advanced Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Presentation and Survival by Receptor Status in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 2010-2014.

Authors:  Mary C Schroeder; Priya Rastogi; Charles E Geyer; Lance D Miller; Alexandra Thomas
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-01-12

10.  Metaplastic Carcinoma Breast: A Clinical Analysis of Nine Cases.

Authors:  Manashi Ghosh; A Muneer; Vinita Trivedi; Kaustav Mandal; Santosh Shubham
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.