Literature DB >> 29330212

Early and Locally Advanced Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Presentation and Survival by Receptor Status in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 2010-2014.

Mary C Schroeder1, Priya Rastogi2, Charles E Geyer3, Lance D Miller4, Alexandra Thomas5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease subtype characterized by an aggressive clinical course. MBC is commonly triple negative (TN), although hormone receptor (HR) positive and human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) positive cases do occur. Previous studies have reported similar outcomes for MBC with regard to HR status. Less is known about outcomes for HER2 positive MBC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data were used to identify women diagnosed 2010-2014 with MBC or invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Kaplan-Meier curves estimated overall survival (OS) and multivariate Cox models were fitted. For survival analyses, only first cancers were included, and 2014 diagnoses were excluded to allow for sufficient follow-up.
RESULTS: Our MBC sample included 1,516 women. Relative to women with IDC, women with MBC were more likely to be older (63 vs. 61 years), black (16.0% vs. 11.1%), and present with stage III disease (15.6% vs. 10.8%). HER2 positive and HER2 negative/HR positive MBC tumors represented 5.2% and 23.0% of cases. For MBC overall, 3-year OS was greatest for women with HER2 positive MBC (91.8%), relative to women with TN (75.4%) and HER2 negative/HR positive MBC (77.1%). This difference was more pronounced for stage III MBC, for which 3-year OS was 92.9%, 47.1%, and 42.2% for women with HER2 positive, TN, and HER2 negative/HR positive MBC, respectively. A multivariate Cox model of MBC demonstrated that HER2 positive tumors (relative to TN) were associated with improved survival (hazard ratio = 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.79). In a second Cox model of exclusively HER2 positive tumors, OS did not differ between MBC and IDC disease subtypes (hazard ratio = 1.16, 95% CI 0.48-2.81).
CONCLUSION: In this contemporary, population-based study of women with MBC, HER2 but not HR status was associated with improved survival. Survival was similar between HER2 positive MBC and HER2 positive IDC. This suggests HER2 positive MBC is responsive to HER2-directed therapy, a finding that may offer insights for additional therapeutic approaches to MBC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This population-based study reports recent outcomes, by receptor status, for women with metaplastic breast cancer. Survival in metaplastic breast cancer is not impacted by hormone receptor status. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report indicating that women with human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) positive metaplastic breast cancer have survival superior to women with HER2 negative metaplastic breast cancer and survival similar to women with HER2 positive invasive ductal carcinoma. This information can be used for counseling patients diagnosed with metaplastic breast cancer. Further understanding of HER2 positive metaplastic breast cancer could offer insights for the development of therapeutic approaches to metaplastic breast cancer more broadly. © AlphaMed Press 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Human epidermal growth receptor 2 positive; Metaplastic; Receptor subtype; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29330212      PMCID: PMC5896714          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  33 in total

Review 1.  Management and Outcomes in Metaplastic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ioannis-Georgios Tzanninis; Elias A Kotteas; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos; Panagiota Kontogianni; George Fotopoulos
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Trends in the Treatment of Metastatic Colon and Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Cathy J Bradley; K Robin Yabroff; Joan L Warren; Christopher Zeruto; Neetu Chawla; Elizabeth B Lamont
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  The immune system and response to HER2-targeted treatment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Giampaolo Bianchini; Luca Gianni
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Metaplastic carcinoma show different expression pattern of YAP compared to triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Hye Min Kim; Sang Kyum Kim; Woo Hee Jung; Ja Seung Koo
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-10-25

5.  Immune activation and response to pembrolizumab in POLE-mutant endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Janice M Mehnert; Anshuman Panda; Hua Zhong; Kim Hirshfield; Sherri Damare; Katherine Lane; Levi Sokol; Mark N Stein; Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriquez; Howard L Kaufman; Siraj Ali; Jeffrey S Ross; Dean C Pavlick; Gyan Bhanot; Eileen P White; Robert S DiPaola; Ann Lovell; Jonathan Cheng; Shridar Ganesan
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Naiyer A Rizvi; Matthew D Hellmann; Alexandra Snyder; Pia Kvistborg; Vladimir Makarov; Jonathan J Havel; William Lee; Jianda Yuan; Phillip Wong; Teresa S Ho; Martin L Miller; Natasha Rekhtman; Andre L Moreira; Fawzia Ibrahim; Cameron Bruggeman; Billel Gasmi; Roberta Zappasodi; Yuka Maeda; Chris Sander; Edward B Garon; Taha Merghoub; Jedd D Wolchok; Ton N Schumacher; Timothy A Chan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Jonathan E Rosenberg; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Tom Powles; Michiel S van der Heijden; Arjun V Balar; Andrea Necchi; Nancy Dawson; Peter H O'Donnell; Ani Balmanoukian; Yohann Loriot; Sandy Srinivas; Margitta M Retz; Petros Grivas; Richard W Joseph; Matthew D Galsky; Mark T Fleming; Daniel P Petrylak; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; Howard A Burris; Daniel Castellano; Christina Canil; Joaquim Bellmunt; Dean Bajorin; Dorothee Nickles; Richard Bourgon; Garrett M Frampton; Na Cui; Sanjeev Mariathasan; Oyewale Abidoye; Gregg D Fine; Robert Dreicer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Breast cancer stem cells and the immune system: promotion, evasion and therapy.

Authors:  Sarah T Boyle; Marina Kochetkova
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 2.673

9.  Survival outcomes of metaplastic breast cancer patients: results from a US population-based analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca A Nelson; Mary L Guye; Thehang Luu; Lily L Lai
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Comprehensive profiling of metaplastic breast carcinomas reveals frequent overexpression of programmed death-ligand 1.

Authors:  Upasana Joneja; Semir Vranic; Jeffrey Swensen; Rebecca Feldman; Wangjuh Chen; Jeffrey Kimbrough; Nianqing Xiao; Sandeep Reddy; Juan Palazzo; Zoran Gatalica
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  24 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: Metaplastic Breast Cancer-The Case for Doing Less and More.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the breast: report of two cases with HER2 overexpression.

Authors:  Ruixue Lei; Lanfang Miao
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.742

3.  Presentation and treatment of aggressive, Triple-Negative carcinosarcoma of the breast.

Authors:  Niels Vizgan; Tahereh Orouji Jokar; Ladan Enayati; Muhammad Salyana; Vladimir K Gotlieb
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-18

4.  Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: Experience of a Tertiary Cancer Center in the Middle East.

Authors:  Ayah Erjan; Hanan Almasri; Hikmat Abdel-Razeq; Mahmoud Al-Masri; Hussam Haddad; Anoud Alnsour; Fadwa Abdel Rahman; Abdulmajeed Dayyat
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

5.  Research on the Role of Combined Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Patients With N+ Non-Metastatic Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: A Competing Risk Analysis Model Based on the SEER database, 2000 to 2015.

Authors:  Yifei Ma; Zejian Yang; Yihan Gao; Kunlong Li; Pei Qiu; Heyan Chen; Shengyu Pu; Bo Wang; Can Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Effects of Surgery on Prognosis of Young Women With Operable Breast Cancer in Different Marital Statuses: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Junsheng Zhang; Ciqiu Yang; Yi Zhang; Fei Ji; Hongfei Gao; Xiaosheng Zhuang; Weiping Li; Weijun Pan; Bo Shen; Tingfeng Zhang; Yuanqi Chen; Kun Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in metaplastic breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Willard Wong; Edi Brogi; Jorge S Reis-Filho; George Plitas; Mark Robson; Larry Norton; Monica Morrow; Hannah Y Wen
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-07-22

8.  Integration of Cancer Registry Data into the Text Information Extraction System: Leveraging the Structured Data Import Tool.

Authors:  Faina Linkov; Jonathan C Silverstein; Michael Davis; Brenda Crocker; Degan Hao; Althea Schneider; Melissa Schwenk; Sharon Winters; Joyce Zelnis; Adrian V Lee; Michael J Becich
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2018-12-24

9.  The role of radiotherapy in metaplastic breast cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of the SEER database.

Authors:  Yongfeng Li; Meng Chen; Barbara Pardini; Mihnea P Dragomir; Anthony Lucci; George A Calin
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 10.  A comprehensive overview of metaplastic breast cancer: clinical features and molecular aberrations.

Authors:  Tejaswini P Reddy; Roberto R Rosato; Xiaoxian Li; Stacy Moulder; Helen Piwnica-Worms; Jenny C Chang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.