Literature DB >> 21287312

Concurrent extinction does not render appetitive conditioning context specific.

James Byron Nelson1, Sebastián Lombas, Samuel P Léon.   

Abstract

In an experiment with rats, an appetitive conditioning method was used to investigate the generality of the hypothesis that extinction should arouse attention to contextual cues, resulting in all learning in that context becoming context specific. Rats received appetitive conditioning with a tone either while extinction of a flasher occurred (Group With Extinction) or while it did not (Group No Extinction). Half of each group was subsequently tested in extinction in the context in which training had taken place or in a different context. The results revealed a three-way interaction of extinction and context with trials, in a direction opposite to the one the hypothesis would suggest. When rats were tested in a different context, there was generally better responding in Group With Extinction than in Group No Extinction. In the same context, there was generally lower responding in Group With Extinction than in Group No Extinction. Subsequent testing showed an ABA recovery effect. Results are discussed in terms of the challenges they pose for the revised retrieval theory presented by Callejas-Aguilera and Rosas (2011).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21287312     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-011-0023-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  15 in total

1.  Inhibition and superconditioning.

Authors:  Ben A Williams; Margaret A McDevitt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

2.  The role of interference produced by conflicting associations in contextual control.

Authors:  James Byron Nelson; José Enrique Callejas-Aguilera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2007-07

3.  Within-subject renewal in sign tracking.

Authors:  Robert A Rescorla
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components.

Authors:  F E SATTERTHWAITE
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1946-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  M E Bouton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Context switch effects on acquisition and extinction in human predictive learning.

Authors:  Juan M Rosas; José E Callejas-Aguilera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Ambiguity and context processing in human predictive learning.

Authors:  José E Callejas-Aguilera; Juan M Rosas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-10

10.  Contextual control of first- and second-learned excitation and inhibition in equally ambiguous stimuli.

Authors:  James Byron Nelson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.986

View more
  4 in total

1.  Contextual control of conditioning is not affected by extinction in a behavioral task with humans.

Authors:  James Byron Nelson; Jeffrey A Lamoureux
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 2.  Context change and associative learning.

Authors:  Juan M Rosas; Travis P Todd; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-13

3.  Ambiguity produces attention shifts in category learning.

Authors:  Miguel A Vadillo; Cristina Orgaz; David Luque; James Byron Nelson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  The effects of extinction-aroused attention on context conditioning.

Authors:  James Byron Nelson; Andrew M Fabiano; Jeffrey A Lamoureux
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.460

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.