Literature DB >> 19122056

Contextual control of first- and second-learned excitation and inhibition in equally ambiguous stimuli.

James Byron Nelson1.   

Abstract

In two three-phase experiments, rats received a final third excitatory (Experiment 1) or inhibitory (Experiment 2) phase of conditioning with a tone. The third phase came immediately prior to a test with the tone, either in the context where the tone was trained or in a different context. Groups differed in each experiment with respect to the first two phases. Rats in Groups EIE (Experiment 1) and EII (Experiment 2) received excitatory conditioning with the tone in Phase 1, followed by inhibitory conditioning with the tone. Rats in Groups IEE (Experiment 1) and IEI (Experiment 2) received inhibitory conditioning in Phase 1, followed by excitatory conditioning in Phase 2. Thus, the association being expressed in Phase 3 was consistent either with what was learned first about the stimuli or with what was learned second. Contrary to expectations, the association being expressed at the end of Phase 3, either excitatory or inhibitory, was affected by a context change, regardless of its consistency with what was learned first about the CS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19122056     DOI: 10.3758/LB.37.1.95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  13 in total

1.  Context-sensitive elemental theory.

Authors:  Allan R Wagner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2003-02

2.  An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components.

Authors:  F E SATTERTHWAITE
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1946-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Context-specific conditioning in the conditioned-emotional-response procedure.

Authors:  G Hall; R C Honey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1990-07

4.  The effects of changing contexts on return of fear following exposure therapy for spider fear.

Authors:  S Mineka; J L Mystkowski; D Hladek; B I Rodriguez
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1999-08

Review 5.  Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  M E Bouton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Context-specificity of target versus feature inhibition in a feature-negative discrimination.

Authors:  M E Bouton; J B Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1994-01

7.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 8.  A modern learning theory perspective on the etiology of panic disorder.

Authors:  M E Bouton; S Mineka; D H Barlow
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear: tests for the associative value of the context.

Authors:  M E Bouton; D A King
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1983-07

10.  Factors affecting context specificity of appetitive conditioned responding.

Authors:  J H Maes; R C Havermans; J M Vossen
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 1.777

View more
  6 in total

1.  Concurrent extinction does not render appetitive conditioning context specific.

Authors:  James Byron Nelson; Sebastián Lombas; Samuel P Léon
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Contextual control of conditioning is not affected by extinction in a behavioral task with humans.

Authors:  James Byron Nelson; Jeffrey A Lamoureux
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Comparing the context specificity of extinction and latent inhibition.

Authors:  Ralph R Miller; Mario A Laborda; Cody W Polack; Gonzalo Miguez
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 4.  Stepping back from 'persistence and relapse' to see the forest: Associative interference.

Authors:  Cody W Polack; Jérémie Jozefowiez; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Context specificity of both acquisition and extinction of a Pavlovian conditioned response.

Authors:  Sarah Starosta; Metin Uengoer; Isabelle Bartetzko; Sara Lucke; Onur Güntürkün; Maik C Stüttgen
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Experiencing extinction within a task makes nonextinguished information learned within a different task context-dependent.

Authors:  Rodolfo Bernal-Gamboa; Juan M Rosas; José E Callejas-Aguilera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.