Literature DB >> 21287053

Interference among memory traces.

W N Runquist1.   

Abstract

Several sources of interference in memory are identified. These sources may be grossly classified as processing interference, i.e., that due to disruption of whatever activity occurs during the input or output of to-be-remembered material, or trace interaction, i.e., that due to interference among the stored memories themselves. The latter would appear to be due to simultaneous activation of correct and incorrect associations mediated by confusion among cue stimuli. A consideration of the means by which interference is reduced suggests that interfering associates are not weakened, unlearned, or suppressed except possibly when nominal stimuli are identical and sets of target and interfering items are temporally discriminable. Discriminative encoding of cue stimuli may eliminate these associations, if it operates at the perceptual level. Otherwise, potential interfering associates are activated, but may be rendered functionally impotent by discriminating them from correct associations on the basis of either backward association with discriminative stimulus attributes or differential contextual attributes such as frequency, time, order, and strength.

Year:  1975        PMID: 21287053     DOI: 10.3758/BF03212891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  TRANSFER IN PERCEPTUAL LEARNING FOLLOWING STIMULUS PREDIFFERENTIATION.

Authors:  H C ELLIS; D G MULLER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1964-10

2.  UNLEARNING AS A FUNCTION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE RESPONSE CLASSES.

Authors:  L POSTMAN; G KEPPEL; K STARK
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-02

3.  A measure of stimulus similarity and errors in some paired-associate learning tasks.

Authors:  E Z ROTHKOPF
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-02

4.  Retroactive inhibition with increased recall-time.

Authors:  B J UNDERWOOD
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1950-01

5.  Memory for modality of presentation: Within-modality discrimination.

Authors:  L L Light; C Stansbury; C Rubin; S Linde
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1973-09

6.  Critical issues in interference theory.

Authors:  L Postman; B J Underwood
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1973-03

7.  Reversal vs. non-reversal re-pairing in categorized paired-associate lists.

Authors:  W N Runquist
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1968-08

8.  An analysis of some shortcomings in the interference theory of forgetting.

Authors:  B J Underwood; B R Ekstrand
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Conditions of cue selection in the acquisition of paired-associate lists.

Authors:  L Postman; R Greenbloom
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-01

10.  Processing demands during mental operations.

Authors:  B Kerr
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1973-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  Retroactive inhibition as a function of the locus of categorized response sets.

Authors:  H L Chiesi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-09

2.  The correlation between cue differentiation and associative recall.

Authors:  W N Runquist; L Renney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-07

3.  Mask similarity impacts short-term consolidation in visual working memory.

Authors:  Lisa Durrance Blalock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

4.  Proactive interference does not meaningfully distort visual working memory capacity estimates in the canonical change detection task.

Authors:  Po-Han Lin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.