Literature DB >> 21286236

Age-Group Differences in Interference from Young and Older Emotional Faces.

Natalie C Ebner1, Marcia K Johnson.   

Abstract

Human attention is selective, focusing on some aspects of events at the expense of others. In particular, angry faces engage attention. Most studies have used pictures of young faces, even when comparing young and older age groups. Two experiments asked (1) whether task-irrelevant faces of young and older individuals with happy, angry, and neutral expressions disrupt performance on a face-unrelated task, (2) whether interference varies for faces of different ages and different facial expressions, and (3) whether young and older adults differ in this regard. Participants gave speeded responses on a number task while irrelevant faces appeared in the background. Both age groups were more distracted by own than other-age faces. In addition, young participants' responses were slower for angry than happy faces, whereas older participants' responses were slower for happy than angry faces. Factors underlying age-group differences in interference from emotional faces of different ages are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21286236      PMCID: PMC3030265          DOI: 10.1080/02699930903128395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Emot        ISSN: 0269-9931


  82 in total

1.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition.

Authors:  I Gauthier; P Skudlarski; J C Gore; A W Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning.

Authors:  A Ohman; S Mineka
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Age-related differences in the medial temporal lobe responses to emotional faces as revealed by fMRI.

Authors:  Tetsuya Iidaka; Tomohisa Okada; Tetsuhito Murata; Masao Omori; Hirotaka Kosaka; Norihiro Sadato; Yoshiharu Yonekura
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.899

4.  Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex.

Authors:  D I Perrett; J K Hietanen; M W Oram; P J Benson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Awareness of faces is modulated by their emotional meaning.

Authors:  Maarten Milders; Arash Sahraie; Sarah Logan; Niamh Donnellon
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2006-02

7.  Age differences in emotion recognition skills and the visual scanning of emotion faces.

Authors:  Susan Sullivan; Ted Ruffman; Sam B Hutton
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala.

Authors:  J S Morris; A Ohman; R J Dolan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-06-04       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Implicit trustworthiness decisions: automatic coding of face properties in the human amygdala.

Authors:  Andrew D Engell; James V Haxby; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  The Multi-Source Interference Task: validation study with fMRI in individual subjects.

Authors:  G Bush; L M Shin; J Holmes; B R Rosen; B A Vogt
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 15.992

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  The emotion paradox in the aging brain.

Authors:  Mara Mather
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Electrophysiological correlates of processing faces of younger and older individuals.

Authors:  Natalie C Ebner; Yi He; Harlan M Fichtenholtz; Gregory McCarthy; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Negative arousal increases the effects of stimulus salience in older adults.

Authors:  Matthew R Sutherland; Mara Mather
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.645

4.  The own-age bias in face memory is unrelated to differences in attention--evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Markus F Neumann; Albert End; Stefanie Luttmann; Stefan R Schweinberger; Holger Wiese
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Age and emotion affect how we look at a face: visual scan patterns differ for own-age versus other-age emotional faces.

Authors:  Natalie C Ebner; Yi He; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2011-05-27

6.  ERP evidence for own-age effects on late stages of processing sad faces.

Authors:  Mara Fölster; Katja Werheid
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Impact of polysubstance use on social and non-affective cognitive performance among treatment-seeking individuals with alcohol use disorders.

Authors:  Ben Lewis; Christian C Garcia; Riley Bohan; Sara Jo Nixon
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  WHAT PREDICTS THE OWN-AGE BIAS IN FACE RECOGNITION MEMORY?

Authors:  Yi He; Natalie C Ebner; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Soc Cogn       Date:  2011-01-27

9.  Medial prefrontal cortex activity when thinking about others depends on their age.

Authors:  Natalie C Ebner; Sebastian Gluth; Matthew R Johnson; Carol L Raye; Karen J Mitchell; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.881

10.  Processing own-age vs. other-age faces: neuro-behavioral correlates and effects of emotion.

Authors:  Natalie C Ebner; Matthew R Johnson; Anna Rieckmann; Kelly A Durbin; Marcia K Johnson; Håkan Fischer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.