Literature DB >> 25978446

Negative arousal increases the effects of stimulus salience in older adults.

Matthew R Sutherland1, Mara Mather.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND/STUDY CONTEXT: Stimuli compete for mental representation, with salient stimuli attracting more attention than less salient stimuli. In a recent study, we found that presenting an emotionally negative arousing sound before briefly showing an array of letters with different levels of salience increased the reporting of the more salient letters but decreased reporting of the less salient letters (Sutherland & Mather, 2012, Emotion, 12, 1367-1372). In the current study we examined whether negative arousal produces similar effects on attention in older adults.
METHODS: Data from 55 older adults (61-80 years; M = 70.7, SD = 5.1) were compared with those from 110 younger adults (18-29 years; M = 20.3, SD = 2.3) from Sutherland and Mather (2012). Neutral or negative arousing sound clips were played before a brief presentation of eight letters, three of which were presented in a darker font than the others to create a group of high- and low-salience targets. Next, participants recalled as many of the letters as they could. At the end of the study, participants rated the emotional arousal and the valence of the sounds.
RESULTS: Higher ratings of emotional arousal for the sounds predicted a greater advantage for high-salience letters in recall. This influence of arousal did not significantly differ by age.
CONCLUSION: The effects of negative arousal on subsequent attention were similar in older adults as in younger adults. Moreover, the results support arousal-biased competition theory (Mather & Sutherland, 2011, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 114-133), which predicts that emotional arousal amplifies the effects of stimulus salience in attention and memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25978446      PMCID: PMC5777218          DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2015.1021644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Aging Res        ISSN: 0361-073X            Impact factor:   1.645


  32 in total

1.  Affect-biased attention as emotion regulation.

Authors:  Rebecca M Todd; William A Cunningham; Adam K Anderson; Evan Thompson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Negative arousal amplifies the effects of saliency in short-term memory.

Authors:  Matthew R Sutherland; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2012-05-28

Review 3.  Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  The influence of emotional valence on age differences in early processing and memory.

Authors:  Ruthann C Thomas; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-12

5.  False recognition in younger and older adults: exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.

Authors:  K A Norman; D L Schacter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

Review 6.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Emotion, physiology, and expression in old age.

Authors:  R W Levenson; L L Carstensen; W V Friesen; P Ekman
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1991-03

8.  How arousal modulates the visual contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  Tae-Ho Lee; Jongsoo Baek; Zhong-Lin Lu; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2014-06-16

9.  Aging and Visual Attention.

Authors:  David J Madden
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-04

10.  Affective salience can reverse the effects of stimulus-driven salience on eye movements in complex scenes.

Authors:  Yaqing Niu; Rebecca M Todd; A K Anderson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-25
View more
  7 in total

1.  Perceptual salience does not influence emotional arousal's impairing effects on top-down attention.

Authors:  Matthew R Sutherland; Douglas A McQuiggan; Jennifer D Ryan; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2017-01-12

Review 2.  The Affective Neuroscience of Aging.

Authors:  Mara Mather
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Threat reduces value-driven but not salience-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Andy Jeesu Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-03-14

4.  Arousal (but not valence) amplifies the impact of salience.

Authors:  Matthew R Sutherland; Mara Mather
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2017-06-01

5.  Effects of hunger on emotional arousal responses and attention/memory biases.

Authors:  Alison Montagrin; Bruna Martins-Klein; David Sander; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-10-07

6.  Arousal-Biased Competition Explains Reduced Distraction by Reward Cues under Threat.

Authors:  Andy J Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-07-07

7.  Encoding of goal-relevant stimuli is strengthened by emotional arousal in memory.

Authors:  Tae-Ho Lee; Steven G Greening; Mara Mather
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.