Literature DB >> 21286218

Enhanced recovery after surgery programs hasten recovery after colorectal resections.

Ned Abraham1, Sinan Albayati.   

Abstract

Colorectal resection was traditionally associated with significant morbidity and prolonged stay in hospital. Laparoscopic colorectal resection was first described in 1991 as a minimally invasive form of colorectal surgery. It was later on assessed by multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis and was found to be associated with a faster recovery, lower complication rates and a shorter stay in hospital compared with open resection. To assess the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program on postoperative length of stay after elective colorectal resections, a literature review was conducted, supplemented by the results of 111 ERAS colorectal resections at regional NWS Hospital using a protocol based on the Fast Track approach described by Kehlet in 1999. ERAS has been shown to improve postoperative recovery, reduce length of stay and enhance early return to normal function when compared with traditional colorectal surgical protocols. The role of laparoscopic surgery in colorectal resections within a fast-track (ERAS) program is controversial. The current evidence suggests that within such a program, there is no difference between laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery in terms of postoperative recovery rates or length of hospital stay.

Keywords:  Colorectal surgery; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Laparoscopy

Year:  2011        PMID: 21286218      PMCID: PMC3030737          DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v3.i1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg


  38 in total

1.  Patterns in current perioperative practice: survey of colorectal surgeons in five northern European countries.

Authors:  Kristoffer Lassen; Pascal Hannemann; Olle Ljungqvist; Ken Fearon; Cornelis H C Dejong; Maarten F von Meyenfeldt; Jonatan Hausel; Jonas Nygren; Jens Andersen; Arthur Revhaug
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-23

2.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  P M King; J M Blazeby; P Ewings; P J Franks; R J Longman; A H Kendrick; R M Kipling; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery.

Authors:  J Wind; S W Polle; P H P Fung Kon Jin; C H C Dejong; M F von Meyenfeldt; D T Ubbink; D J Gouma; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  Fluid therapy and surgical outcomes in elective surgery: a need for reassessment in fast-track surgery.

Authors:  Kathrine Holte; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 5.  The role of the anesthesiologist in fast-track surgery: from multimodal analgesia to perioperative medical care.

Authors:  Paul F White; Henrik Kehlet; Joseph M Neal; Thomas Schricker; Daniel B Carr; Franco Carli
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative studies of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ned S Abraham; Christopher M Byrne; Jane M Young; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.872

7.  Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery.

Authors:  Vadim Nisanevich; Itamar Felsenstein; Gidon Almogy; Charles Weissman; Sharon Einav; Idit Matot
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Norbert Hüser; Christoph W Michalski; Mert Erkan; Tibor Schuster; Robert Rosenberg; Jörg Kleeff; Helmut Friess
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  R Nelson; S Edwards; B Tse
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

10.  Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial).

Authors:  Jan Wind; Jan Hofland; Benedikt Preckel; Markus W Hollmann; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Dirk J Gouma; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Jan Willem Fuhring; Cornelis H C Dejong; Ronald M van Dam; Miguel A Cuesta; Astrid Noordhuis; Dick de Jong; Edith van Zalingen; Alexander F Engel; T Hauwy Goei; I Erica de Stoppelaar; Willem F van Tets; Bart A van Wagensveld; Annemiek Swart; Maarten J L J van den Elsen; Michael F Gerhards; Laurens Th de Wit; Muriel A M Siepel; Anna A W van Geloven; Jan-Willem Juttmann; Wilfred Clevers; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  9 in total

1.  Usefulness of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for perioperative management following open repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Wataru Tatsuishi; Takayuki Kohri; Kojiro Kodera; Ryota Asano; Go Kataoka; Sayaka Kubota; Kiyoharu Nakano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies: possible advantages also for head and neck surgery patients?

Authors:  Chiara Bianchini; Stefano Pelucchi; Antonio Pastore; Carlo V Feo; Andrea Ciorba
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Fast-track program vs traditional care in surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zhi-Xing Chen; Ae-Huey Jennifer Liu; Ying Cen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Insights into fast-track colon surgery: a plea for a tailored program.

Authors:  L Pellegrino; F Lois; C Remue; P Forget; B Crispin; D Leonard; J Jamart; A Kartheuser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Enhanced recovery after elective colorectal resection outside a strict fast-track protocol. A single centre experience.

Authors:  A C Agrafiotis; M Corbeau; A Buggenhout; G Katsanos; B Ickx; J Van de Stadt
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Enhanced recovery program (ERP) in major laryngeal surgery: building a protocol and testing its feasibility.

Authors:  M Gemma; S Toma; F Lira Luce; L Beretta; M Braga; M Bussi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Dai Shida; Kyoko Tagawa; Kentaro Inada; Keiichi Nasu; Yasuji Seyama; Tsuyoshi Maeshiro; Sachio Miyamoto; Satoru Inoue; Nobutaka Umekita
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for colorectal cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Dai Shida; Kyoko Tagawa; Kentaro Inada; Keiichi Nasu; Yasuji Seyama; Tsuyoshi Maeshiro; Sachio Miyamoto; Satoru Inoue; Nobutaka Umekita
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Factors affecting serum albumin in the perioperative period of colorectal surgery: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Akihiro Sonoda; Shun Ohnishi; Shoji Nakao; Yoshitaka Iwashita; Naomi Hashimoto; Kazuhisa Ishida; Yuki Kondo; Yoichi Ishitsuka; Tetsumi Irie
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-11-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.