Literature DB >> 23982426

Enhanced recovery after elective colorectal resection outside a strict fast-track protocol. A single centre experience.

A C Agrafiotis1, M Corbeau, A Buggenhout, G Katsanos, B Ickx, J Van de Stadt.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Optimising the management of hospitalised patients is a major concern. In colorectal surgery, the concept of enhanced recovery has been popularised by means of "fast-track" protocols, aiming at patient's discharge on the second postoperative day. Nevertheless, a strict fast-track protocol has several limitations. It is very demanding for the patient and therefore applicable only to a limited number of patients. AIM: In order to optimise, in every aspect, the postoperative recovery of each patient undergoing an elective colorectal resection inside our institution, we set up a "soft" enhanced recovery programme. MATERIAL-
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted in 92 patients evaluating the respective impact of protocol application throughout the duration of the hospital stay.
RESULTS: When all the required measures of our protocol were correctly implemented, the median discharge day was postoperative day 3 (range 3-5 days). On the contrary, when deviations occurred, they resulted in longer hospital stay (p < 0.001). Patients operated by laparoscopy were discharged earlier than patients operated by laparotomy (p < 0.001). The use of nasogastric tube and postoperative drainage prolonged significantly the length of stay (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively). When the urinary catheter was not removed or oral feeding not resumed on postoperative day 1, the patients were discharged later (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial possibilities of optimising the recovery process after an elective colorectal resection, outside a strict fast-track protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23982426     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1767-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  12 in total

Review 1.  Management of patients in fast track surgery.

Authors:  D W Wilmore; H Kehlet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-24

2.  Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme.

Authors:  H Kehlet; T Mogensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Fast track colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Timothy C Counihan; Joanne Favuzza
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-02

Review 4.  Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery.

Authors:  J Wind; S W Polle; P H P Fung Kon Jin; C H C Dejong; M F von Meyenfeldt; D T Ubbink; D J Gouma; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Enhanced recovery after surgery programs hasten recovery after colorectal resections.

Authors:  Ned Abraham; Sinan Albayati
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-01-27

6.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

7.  Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study).

Authors:  Malaika S Vlug; Jan Wind; Markus W Hollmann; Dirk T Ubbink; Huib A Cense; Alexander F Engel; Michael F Gerhards; Bart A van Wagensveld; Edwin S van der Zaag; Anna A W van Geloven; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Miguel A Cuesta; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gouvas; Emile Tan; Alistair Windsor; Evaghelos Xynos; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Laparoscopic segmental resection of the sigmoid colon for endometriosis.

Authors:  D B Redwine; D R Sharpe
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1991-08

10.  Fast track multi-discipline treatment (FTMDT trial) versus conventional treatment in colorectal cancer--the design of a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jiao-Jiao Zhou; Jun Li; Xiao-Jiang Ying; Yong-Mao Song; Rong Chen; Gang Chen; Min Yan; Ke-Feng Ding
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Factors predicting outcome from enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  David E Messenger; Nathan J Curtis; Adam Jones; Emma L Jones; Neil J Smart; Nader K Francis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The effects of fast-track surgery on inflammation and immunity in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Jinhua Feng; Ka Li; Li Li; Xiaodong Wang; Mingjun Huang; Jie Yang; Yanjie Hu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Does Implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Colorectal Surgery Improve Patient Outcomes?

Authors:  Kristen A Ban; Julia R Berian; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-02-28

4.  Nonstrict and individual enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in partial hepatectomy.

Authors:  Xingwei Xu; Yingbin Wang; Tao Feng; Xin Zhao; Yannian Liao; Wu Ji; Jieshou Li
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-11-25

5.  ERAS protocol in laparoscopic surgery for colonic versus rectal carcinoma: are there differences in short-term outcomes?

Authors:  Michał Pędziwiatr; Magdalena Pisarska; Michał Kisielewski; Piotr Major; Anna Mydlowska; Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Marek Winiarski; Andrzej Budzyński
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Enhanced recovery after surgery in liver transplantation: Challenges and feasibility.

Authors:  Georgios Katsanos; Konstantina-Eleni Karakasi; Nikolaos Antoniadis; Stella Vasileiadou; Athanasios Kofinas; Antonios Morsi-Yeroyannis; Evangelia Michailidou; Ioannis Goulis; Emmanouil Sinakos; Olga Giouleme; Ilias Marios Oikonomou; George Evlavis; Georgios Tsakiris; Eleni Massa; Eleni Mouloudi; Georgios Tsoulfas
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2022-07-18

7.  Michigan Appropriate Perioperative (MAP) criteria for urinary catheter use in common general and orthopaedic surgeries: results obtained using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.

Authors:  Jennifer Meddings; Ted A Skolarus; Karen E Fowler; Steven J Bernstein; Justin B Dimick; Jason D Mann; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-08-12       Impact factor: 7.035

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.