Literature DB >> 21284760

Impression materials in fixed prosthodontics: influence of choice on clinical procedure.

Techkouhie A Hamalian1, Elie Nasr, José J Chidiac.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review impression materials used for fabricating fixed restorations in dentistry. Their compositions, properties, advantages, and disadvantages are presented and compared. How these properties influence clinical decisions is also described. This review helps the clinician choose which material is more suitable for a specific case. A broad search of the published literature was performed using Medline to identify pertinent current articles. Textbooks, the Internet, and manufacturers' literature were also used to supplement this information. It is limited to impression materials used in fixed prosthodontics. The review gives basic knowledge of ideal impression material properties and discusses traditional and, primarily, more recently developed products, such as polyethers, poly(vinyl siloxane), polysulfides, and condensation silicone materials. Clear advantages and disadvantages for these impression materials are provided along with the role that compositional variations have on the outcome of the impression. This should enable clinicians and technicians to easily identify the important physical properties of each type of impression material and their primary clinical indications.
© 2011 by The American College of Prosthodontists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21284760     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00673.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  21 in total

1.  A new 3D-method to assess the inter implant dimensions in patients - A pilot study.

Authors:  Alexander Schmidt; Jan-Wilhelm Billig; Maximiliane A Schlenz; Bernd Wöstmann
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-02-01

2.  A Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Addition Silicone of Different Consistencies with Two Different Spacer Designs - In-vitro Study.

Authors:  Suprabha Rathee; B Eswaran; Ma Eswaran; R Prabhu; Kr Geetha; Gp Krishna
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-07-20

3.  Impression materials and techniques used in fixed prosthodontics: A questionnaire-based survey to evaluate the knowledge and practice of dental students in Riyadh city.

Authors:  Abdul S Ansari; Musab A Alsaidan; Saleh K Algadhi; Mishary A Alrasheed; Ibrahim G Al Talib; Abdullah K Alsaaid; Shahzeb H Ansari
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-01-19

4.  Mechanical Properties of Elastomeric Impression Materials: An In Vitro Comparison.

Authors:  Dino Re; Francesco De Angelis; Gabriele Augusti; Davide Augusti; Sergio Caputi; Maurizio D'Amario; Camillo D'Arcangelo
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-11-26

5.  Comparison of marginal fit of cemented zirconia copings manufactured after digital impression with lava™ C.O.S and conventional impression technique.

Authors:  Rinet Dauti; Barbara Cvikl; Alexander Franz; Uwe Yacine Schwarze; Bledar Lilaj; Tina Rybaczek; Andreas Moritz
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Accuracy of a separating foil impression using a novel polyolefin foil compared to a custom tray and a stock tray technique.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Pastoret; Gabriel Krastl; Julia Bühler; Roland Weiger; Nicola Ursula Zitzmann
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Accuracy of Gypsum Casts after Different Impression Techniques and Double Pouring.

Authors:  Stephania Caroline Rodolfo Silva; Aion Mangino Messias; Filipe de Oliveira Abi-Rached; Raphael Freitas de Souza; José Maurício Dos Santos Nunes Reis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Investigation of the effects of storage time on the dimensional accuracy of impression materials using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Murat Alkurt; Zeynep Yeşıl Duymus; Numan Dedeoglu
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Pneumatic impression: Improving dental arch impression with an inflatable balloon.

Authors:  Lokendra Gupta
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

10.  Dimensional stability of two impression materials after a 6-month storage period.

Authors:  Francisco Martins; Patrícia Branco; José Reis; Ignacio Barbero Navarro; Paulo Maurício
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2017-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.