PURPOSE: Monitoring patient-reported symptoms is necessary to adjust and improve supportive care during chemotherapy. Continuing advances in computerized approaches to symptom monitoring can enhance communication about unrelieved symptoms between patients and oncology providers and may facilitate intensified symptom treatment. METHODS: An automated IT-based telephone monitoring system was developed to enable oncology providers to receive and act on alert reports from patients about unrelieved symptoms during chemotherapy treatment. Daily, 250 participants (randomized to treatment orattentional control) were asked to call the automated system to report presence, severity, and distress for common chemotherapy-related symptoms (1-10 scale if present). For the treatment group, symptoms exceeding preset thresholds for moderate-to-severe intensity levels generated emailed alert reports to both the patient's oncologist and oncology nurse. RESULTS: Patients reported high satisfaction and ease of use of the automated system. Over 80 % of providers reported usefulness of the symptom alert reports. Ten monitored symptoms resulted in, on average, nine moderate-to-severe intensity alerts per patient over 45 study days. However, providers rarely contacted patients after receiving alerts. There were no significant differences in change of symptom severity between the two groups (mean difference = 0.06, p = 0.58). CONCLUSION: Despite patients' use of a daily symptom monitoring system and providers' receipt of information about unrelieved symptoms of moderate-to-severe intensity, oncology physicians and nurses did not contact patients to intensify symptom treatment nor did symptoms improve. Further research is indicated to determine if oncology providers initiated follow-up to intensify symptom treatment, whether symptom outcomes would improve.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Monitoring patient-reported symptoms is necessary to adjust and improve supportive care during chemotherapy. Continuing advances in computerized approaches to symptom monitoring can enhance communication about unrelieved symptoms between patients and oncology providers and may facilitate intensified symptom treatment. METHODS: An automated IT-based telephone monitoring system was developed to enable oncology providers to receive and act on alert reports from patients about unrelieved symptoms during chemotherapy treatment. Daily, 250 participants (randomized to treatment or attentional control) were asked to call the automated system to report presence, severity, and distress for common chemotherapy-related symptoms (1-10 scale if present). For the treatment group, symptoms exceeding preset thresholds for moderate-to-severe intensity levels generated emailed alert reports to both the patient's oncologist and oncology nurse. RESULTS:Patients reported high satisfaction and ease of use of the automated system. Over 80 % of providers reported usefulness of the symptom alert reports. Ten monitored symptoms resulted in, on average, nine moderate-to-severe intensity alerts per patient over 45 study days. However, providers rarely contacted patients after receiving alerts. There were no significant differences in change of symptom severity between the two groups (mean difference = 0.06, p = 0.58). CONCLUSION: Despite patients' use of a daily symptom monitoring system and providers' receipt of information about unrelieved symptoms of moderate-to-severe intensity, oncology physicians and nurses did not contact patients to intensify symptom treatment nor did symptoms improve. Further research is indicated to determine if oncology providers initiated follow-up to intensify symptom treatment, whether symptom outcomes would improve.
Authors: Donna L Berry; Brent A Blumenstein; Barbara Halpenny; Seth Wolpin; Jesse R Fann; Mary Austin-Seymour; Nigel Bush; Bryant T Karras; William B Lober; Ruth McCorkle Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-02-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Emily D Williams; Dominique Bird; Andrew W Forbes; Anthony Russell; Susan Ash; Robert Friedman; Paul A Scuffham; Brian Oldenburg Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: B O'Connor; M Markicevic; L Newman; R K Poduval; E Tiernan; E Hanrahan; S Cuffe; R B Reilly; D Walsh Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-11-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Qiuling Shi; Ju-Whei Lee; Xin Shelley Wang; Michael J Fisch; Victor T Chang; Lynne Wagner; Charles S Cleeland Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2020-05-05
Authors: Heather S L Jim; Aasha I Hoogland; Naomi C Brownstein; Anna Barata; Adam P Dicker; Hans Knoop; Brian D Gonzalez; Randa Perkins; Dana Rollison; Scott M Gilbert; Ronica Nanda; Anders Berglund; Ross Mitchell; Peter A S Johnstone Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Melissa Beauchemin; Meghan T Murray; Lillian Sung; Dawn L Hershman; Chunhua Weng; Rebecca Schnall Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Christopher R Friese; Alex J Fauer; Clare Kuisell; Kari Mendelsohn-Victor; Nathan C Wright; Jennifer J Griggs; Milisa Manojlovich Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 3.402