Literature DB >> 21280899

Probe pressure effects on human skin diffuse reflectance and fluorescence spectroscopy measurements.

Liang Lim1, Brandon Nichols, Narasimhan Rajaram, James W Tunnell.   

Abstract

Diffuse reflectance and fluorescence spectroscopy are popular research techniques for noninvasive disease diagnostics. Most systems include an optical fiber probe that transmits and collects optical spectra in contact with the suspected lesion. The purpose of this study is to investigate probe pressure effects on human skin spectroscopic measurements. We conduct an in-vivo experiment on human skin tissue to study the short-term (<2 s) and long-term (>30 s) effects of probe pressure on diffuse reflectance and fluorescence measurements. Short-term light probe pressure (P0<9 mN∕mm2) effects are within 0 ± 10% on all physiological properties extracted from diffuse reflectance and fluorescence measurements, and less than 0±5% for diagnostically significant physiological properties. Absorption decreases with site-specific variations due to blood being compressed out of the sampled volume. Reduced scattering coefficient variation is site specific. Intrinsic fluorescence shows a large standard error, although no specific pressure-related trend is observed. Differences in tissue structure and morphology contribute to site-specific probe pressure effects. Therefore, the effects of pressure can be minimized when the pressure is small and applied for a short amount of time; however, long-term and large pressures induce significant distortions in measured spectra.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21280899      PMCID: PMC3041811          DOI: 10.1117/1.3525288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  29 in total

1.  Epidermal thickness at different body sites: relationship to age, gender, pigmentation, blood content, skin type and smoking habits.

Authors:  Jane Sandby-Møller; Thomas Poulsen; Hans Christian Wulf
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.437

2.  Effect of probe pressure on cervical fluorescence spectroscopy measurements.

Authors:  Audrey Nath; Kelley Rivoire; Sung Chang; Dennis Cox; E Neely Atkinson; Michele Follen; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  In vivo multiphoton microscopy of NADH and FAD redox states, fluorescence lifetimes, and cellular morphology in precancerous epithelia.

Authors:  Melissa C Skala; Kristin M Riching; Annette Gendron-Fitzpatrick; Jens Eickhoff; Kevin W Eliceiri; John G White; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Analysis of changes in reflectance measurements on biological tissues subjected to different probe pressures.

Authors:  Roberto Reif; Mark S Amorosino; Katherine W Calabro; Ousama A'Amar; Satish K Singh; Irving J Bigio
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Diagnosing breast cancer using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy.

Authors:  Zoya Volynskaya; Abigail S Haka; Kate L Bechtel; Maryann Fitzmaurice; Robert Shenk; Nancy Wang; Jon Nazemi; Ramachandra R Dasari; Michael S Feld
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Pilot clinical study for quantitative spectral diagnosis of non-melanoma skin cancer.

Authors:  Narasimhan Rajaram; Jason S Reichenberg; Michael R Migden; Tri H Nguyen; James W Tunnell
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  Noninvasive functional optical spectroscopy of human breast tissue.

Authors:  N Shah; A Cerussi; C Eker; J Espinoza; J Butler; J Fishkin; R Hornung; B Tromberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Effect of contact force on breast tissue optical property measurements using a broadband diffuse optical spectroscopy handheld probe.

Authors:  Albert Cerussi; Sarah Siavoshi; Amanda Durkin; Cynthia Chen; Wendy Tanamai; David Hsiang; Bruce J Tromberg
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 1.980

9.  Elastic scattering spectroscopy for detection of cancer risk in Barrett's esophagus: experimental and clinical validation of error removal by orthogonal subtraction for increasing accuracy.

Authors:  Ying Zhu; Tom Fearn; Gary Mackenzie; Ben Clark; Jason M Dunn; Irving J Bigio; Stephen G Bown; Laurence B Lovat
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Subcellular-resolution molecular imaging within living tissue by fiber microendoscopy.

Authors:  Timothy J Muldoon; Mark C Pierce; Dawn L Nida; Michelle D Williams; Ann Gillenwater; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  26 in total

1.  Development of a noncontact diffuse optical spectroscopy probe for measuring tissue optical properties.

Authors:  Sheldon F Bish; Narasimhan Rajaram; Brandon Nichols; James W Tunnell
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Properties of contact pressure induced by manually operated fiber-optic probes.

Authors:  Maksimilijan Bregar; Blaž Cugmas; Peter Naglic; Daniela Hartmann; Franjo Pernuš; Boštjan Likar; Miran Bürmen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Intraoperative optical assessment of photodynamic therapy response of superficial oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel J Rohrbach; Nestor Rigual; Hassan Arshad; Erin C Tracy; Michelle T Cooper; Gal Shafirstein; Gregory Wilding; Mihai Merzianu; Heinz Baumann; Barbara W Henderson; Ulas Sunar
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Impact of one-layer assumption on diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of skin.

Authors:  Ricky Hennessy; Mia K Markey; James W Tunnell
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Method of detecting tissue contact for fiber-optic probes to automate data acquisition without hardware modification.

Authors:  Sarah Ruderman; Scott Mueller; Andrew Gomes; Jeremy Rogers; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Next-generation Raman tomography instrument for non-invasive in vivo bone imaging.

Authors:  Jennifer-Lynn H Demers; Francis W L Esmonde-White; Karen A Esmonde-White; Michael D Morris; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Quantitative assessment of hemodynamic and structural characteristics of in vivo brain tissue using total diffuse reflectance spectrum measured in a non-contact fashion.

Authors:  Yinchen Song; Sarahy Garcia; Yisel Frometa; Jessica C Ramella-Roman; Mohammad Soltani; Mohamed Almadi; Jorge J Riera; Wei-Chiang Lin
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Multimodal Imaging and Spectroscopy Fiber-bundle Microendoscopy Platform for Non-invasive, In Vivo Tissue Analysis.

Authors:  Gage J Greening; Narasimhan Rajaram; Timothy J Muldoon
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Flexible silicon sensors for diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of tissue.

Authors:  David M Miller; Nan M Jokerst
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Raman Spectroscopy Differentiates Each Tissue from the Skin to the Spinal Cord: A Novel Method for Epidural Needle Placement?

Authors:  T Anthony Anderson; Jeon Woong Kang; Tatyana Gubin; Ramachandra R Dasari; Peter T C So
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 7.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.