Literature DB >> 21279860

Chemical and antimicrobial treatments change the viscoelastic properties of bacterial biofilms.

Warren L Jones1, Michael P Sutton, Ladean McKittrick, Philip S Stewart.   

Abstract

Changes in the viscoelastic material properties of bacterial biofilms resulting from chemical and antimicrobial treatments were measured by rheometry. Colony biofilms of Staphylococcus epidermidis or a mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa were subjected to a classical creep test performed using a parallel plate rheometer. Data were fit to the 4-parameter Burger model to quantify the material properties. Biofilms were exposed to the chloride salts of several common mono-, di-, and tri- valent cations, and to urea, industrial biocides, and antibiotics. Many of these treatments resulted in statistically significant alterations in the material properties of the biofilm. Multivalent cations stiffened the P. aeruginosa biofilm, while ciprofloxacin and glutaraldehyde weakened it. Urea, rifampin, and a quaternary ammonium biocide weakened the S. epidermidis biofilm. In general, there was no correspondence between the responses of the two different types of biofilms to a particular treatment. These results underscore the distinction between the killing power of an antimicrobial agent and its ability to alter biofilm mechanical properties and thereby influence biofilm removal. Understanding biofilm rheology and how it is affected by chemical treatment could lead to improvements in biofilm control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21279860     DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2011.554977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofouling        ISSN: 0892-7014            Impact factor:   3.209


  30 in total

1.  Mapping of bacterial biofilm local mechanics by magnetic microparticle actuation.

Authors:  Olivier Galy; Patricia Latour-Lambert; Kais Zrelli; Jean-Marc Ghigo; Christophe Beloin; Nelly Henry
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Remote magnetic actuation of micrometric probes for in situ 3D mapping of bacterial biofilm physical properties.

Authors:  Olivier Galy; Kais Zrelli; Patricia Latour-Lambert; Lyndsey Kirwan; Nelly Henry
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Direct Comparison of Physical Properties of Bacillus subtilis NCIB 3610 and B-1 Biofilms.

Authors:  Sara Kesel; Stefan Grumbein; Ina Gümperlein; Marwa Tallawi; Anna-Kristina Marel; Oliver Lieleg; Madeleine Opitz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Interplay of physical mechanisms and biofilm processes: review of microfluidic methods.

Authors:  A Karimi; D Karig; A Kumar; A M Ardekani
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  In situ rheology of Staphylococcus epidermidis bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Leonid Pavlovsky; John G Younger; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.679

6.  Single particle tracking reveals spatial and dynamic organization of the E. coli biofilm matrix.

Authors:  Alona Birjiniuk; Nicole Billings; Elizabeth Nance; Justin Hanes; Katharina Ribbeck; Patrick S Doyle
Journal:  New J Phys       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.729

Review 7.  Material properties of biofilms-a review of methods for understanding permeability and mechanics.

Authors:  Nicole Billings; Alona Birjiniuk; Tahoura S Samad; Patrick S Doyle; Katharina Ribbeck
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2015-02-26

8.  Disruption and eradication of P. aeruginosa biofilms using nitric oxide-releasing chitosan oligosaccharides.

Authors:  Katelyn P Reighard; David B Hill; Graham A Dixon; Brittany V Worley; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Biofouling       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.209

9.  Osmotic pressure can regulate matrix gene expression in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Shmuel M Rubinstein; Ilana Kolodkin-Gal; Anna McLoon; Liraz Chai; Roberto Kolter; Richard Losick; David A Weitz
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.501

10.  Mode of nitric oxide delivery affects antibacterial action.

Authors:  Jackson R Hall; Kaitlyn R Rouillard; Dakota J Suchyta; Micah D Brown; Mona Jasmine R Ahonen; Mark H Schoenfisc
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2019-11-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.