Literature DB >> 25544855

In situ rheology of Staphylococcus epidermidis bacterial biofilms.

Leonid Pavlovsky1, John G Younger2, Michael J Solomon3.   

Abstract

We developed a method to grow Staphylococcus epidermidis bacterial biofilms and characterize their rheological properties in situ in a continuously fed bioreactor incorporated into a parallel plate rheometer. The temperature and shear rates of growth modeled bloodstream conditions, a common site of S. epidermidis infection. We measured the linear elastic (G') and viscous moduli (G″) of the material using small-amplitude oscillatory rheology and the yield stress using non-linear creep rheology. We found that the elastic and viscous moduli of the S. epidermidis biofilm were 11 ± 3 Pa and 1.9 ± 0.5 Pa at a frequency of 1 Hz (6.283 rad per s) and that the yield stress was approximately 20 Pa. We modeled the linear creep response of the biofilm using a Jeffreys model and found that S. epidermidis has a characteristic relaxation time of approximately 750 seconds and a linear creep viscosity of 3000 Pa s. The effects on the linear viscoelastic moduli of environmental stressors, such as NaCl concentration and extremes of temperature, were also studied. We found a non-monotonic relationship between moduli and NaCl concentrations, with the stiffest material properties found at human physiological concentrations (135 mM). Temperature dependent rheology showed hysteresis in the moduli when heated and cooled between 5 °C and 60 °C. Through these experiments, we demonstrated that biofilms are rheologically complex materials that can be characterized by a combination of low modulus (~10 Pa), long relaxation time (~103 seconds), and a finite yield stress (20 Pa). This suggests that biofilms should be viewed as soft viscoelastic solids whose properties are determined in part by local environmental conditions. The in situ growth method introduced here can be adapted to a wide range of biofilm systems and applied over a broad spectrum of rheological and environmental conditions because the technique minimizes the risk of irreversible, non-linear deformation of the microbial specimen before analysis.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 25544855      PMCID: PMC4276346          DOI: 10.1039/C2SM27005F

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soft Matter        ISSN: 1744-683X            Impact factor:   3.679


  30 in total

1.  Filamentous microfossils in a 3,235-million-year-old volcanogenic massive sulphide deposit.

Authors:  B Rasmussen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  icaR encodes a transcriptional repressor involved in environmental regulation of ica operon expression and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  Kevin M Conlon; Hilary Humphreys; James P O'Gara
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  Biofilms as complex differentiated communities.

Authors:  P Stoodley; K Sauer; D G Davies; J W Costerton
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2002-01-30       Impact factor: 15.500

Review 5.  Biofilms: the matrix revisited.

Authors:  Steven S Branda; Shild Vik; Lisa Friedman; Roberto Kolter
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 17.079

6.  Tissue engineering of cartilage in space.

Authors:  L E Freed; R Langer; I Martin; N R Pellis; G Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Contribution of the Klebsiella pneumoniae capsule to bacterial aggregate and biofilm microstructures.

Authors:  Stephen P Dzul; Margaret M Thornton; Danial N Hohne; Elizabeth J Stewart; Aayush A Shah; David M Bortz; Michael J Solomon; John G Younger
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Multicellularity and antibiotic resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae grown under bloodstream-mimicking fluid dynamic conditions.

Authors:  Margaret M Thornton; Hangyul M Chung-Esaki; Charlene B Irvin; David M Bortz; Michael J Solomon; John G Younger
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 9.  Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms.

Authors:  Rodney M Donlan; J William Costerton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Flexible microfluidic device for mechanical property characterization of soft viscoelastic solids such as bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Danial N Hohne; John G Younger; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.882

View more
  27 in total

1.  Elasticity of microscale volumes of viscoelastic soft matter by cavitation rheometry.

Authors:  Leonid Pavlovsky; Mahesh Ganesan; John G Younger; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Using liquid crystals to reveal how mechanical anisotropy changes interfacial behaviors of motile bacteria.

Authors:  Peter C Mushenheim; Rishi R Trivedi; Douglas B Weibel; Nicholas L Abbott
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Thermal Augmentation of Vancomycin Against Staphylococcal Biofilms.

Authors:  Rachael A Sturtevant; Prannda Sharma; Leonid Pavlovsky; Elizabeth J Stewart; Michael J Solomon; John G Younger
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  A microfluidic method and custom model for continuous, non-intrusive biofilm viscosity measurements under different nutrient conditions.

Authors:  J Greener; M Parvinzadeh Gashti; A Eslami; M P Zarabadi; S M Taghavi
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Direct Comparison of Physical Properties of Bacillus subtilis NCIB 3610 and B-1 Biofilms.

Authors:  Sara Kesel; Stefan Grumbein; Ina Gümperlein; Marwa Tallawi; Anna-Kristina Marel; Oliver Lieleg; Madeleine Opitz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Molar mass, entanglement, and associations of the biofilm polysaccharide of Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  Mahesh Ganesan; Elizabeth J Stewart; Jacob Szafranski; Ashley E Satorius; John G Younger; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 7.  Interplay of physical mechanisms and biofilm processes: review of microfluidic methods.

Authors:  A Karimi; D Karig; A Kumar; A M Ardekani
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  Role of environmental and antibiotic stress on Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm microstructure.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Stewart; Ashley E Satorius; John G Younger; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.882

9.  Extracellular DNA facilitates the formation of functional amyloids in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Authors:  Kelly Schwartz; Mahesh Ganesan; David E Payne; Michael J Solomon; Blaise R Boles
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.501

10.  Hemodialysis Catheter Heat Transfer for Biofilm Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Ian P Richardson; Rachael Sturtevant; Michael Heung; Michael J Solomon; John G Younger; J Scott VanEpps
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.