Literature DB >> 21279418

The repeatability of the Goldmann-Weekers adaptometer for measuring cone adaptation.

Allannah J Gaffney1, Alison M Binns, Tom H Margrain.   

Abstract

To assess the inter-session repeatability of the Goldmann-Weekers adaptometer for the measurement of cone dark adaptation in a population of healthy subjects. Data were obtained from 31 healthy adults (mean age 21.5 ± 2.5) on 2 days. At each visit, pupils were dilated and a 96% bleach of cone photopigment was administered to the test eye before threshold was monitored continuously for 5 min in the dark using the Goldmann-Weekers adaptometer. A single exponential function was fitted to the threshold recovery data on a least squares basis. The coefficient of repeatability (CoR) was calculated to assess the repeatability of the time constant of recovery (τ), initial threshold and final threshold. Cone dark adaptation functions were successfully recorded from all subjects on both visits. The CoR was 79.48 s for τ, 0.71 log cdm(-2) for the initial threshold, and 0.58 log cdm(-2) for the final threshold. Paired samples t-tests showed that there were no significant differences between visits for any of the parameters assesed. Although the Goldmann-Weekers adaptometer was capable of monitoring the rapid changes in threshold that occur during cone dark adaptation, the CoR for τ was relatively large compared to the mean recovery time constants (126.48 ± 40.33 and 119.94 ± 33.25 s at the first and second visits, respectively). This indicates that the Goldmann-Weekers adaptometer is unlikely to be a useful instrument to chart changes in an individual's vision over time.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21279418     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-011-9261-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  18 in total

1.  Aging and dark adaptation.

Authors:  G R Jackson; C Owsley; G McGwin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Loss of cone function in age-related maculopathy.

Authors:  Joanna A Phipps; Robyn H Guymer; Algis J Vingrys
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Standard curve and physiological limits of dark adaptation by means of the Goldmann-Weekers adaptometer.

Authors:  P DIETERLE; E GORDON
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  The Scotopic Sensitivity Tester-1 and the detection of early age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Gregory R Jackson; Tiffany Felix; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Rod photoreceptor dysfunction in diabetes: activation, deactivation, and dark adaptation.

Authors:  Joanna A Phipps; Peter Yee; Erica L Fletcher; Algis J Vingrys
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Evaluating retinal function in age-related maculopathy with the ERG photostress test.

Authors:  Alison M Binns; Tom H Margrain
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  A computer-controlled system for measuring dark adaptation and other psychophysical functions.

Authors:  C Friedburg; L T Sharpe; S Beuel; E Zrenner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Visual function and rhodopsin levels in humans with vitamin A deficiency.

Authors:  C M Kemp; S G Jacobson; D J Faulkner; R W Walt
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.467

9.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Reproducible measurement of macular light flash recovery time using a novel device can indicate the presence and worsening of macular diseases.

Authors:  David A Newsome; Manny Negreiro
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.424

View more
  2 in total

1.  Measurement of cone dark adaptation: a comparison of four psychophysical methods.

Authors:  Allannah J Gaffney; Alison M Binns; Tom H Margrain
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Assessment of age changes and repeatability for computer-based rod dark adaptation.

Authors:  Laura Patryas; Neil R A Parry; David Carden; Daniel H Baker; Jeremiah M F Kelly; Tariq Aslam; Ian J Murray
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.117

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.