PURPOSE: To compare parameters describing left ventricular (LV) diastolic function obtained with three-dimensional (3D) three-directional velocity-encoded (VE) MRI with retrospective valve tracking and two-dimensional (2D) one-directional VE MRI in patients with ischemic heart failure. Second, to compare classification of LV diastolic function, and in particular for discriminating restrictive filling patterns, with both MRI techniques versus Doppler echocardiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 3D and 2D VE MRI early (E) and atrial (A) peak flow rate indices, determined from transmitral waveform analyses, were compared. Also, net forward flow volume per cycle and transmitral regurgitation fraction were determined. Agreement in classifying diastolic filling patterns between 3D and 2D VE MRI versus Doppler echocardiography was evaluated using kappa statistics. RESULTS: The 3D three-directional VE MRI with retrospective valve tracking was statistically significantly different from 2D one-directional VE MRI for net forward flow volume and regurgitation fraction through the mitral valve and all parameters describing the diastolic waveform filling pattern, except for the E deceleration time and E/A filling ratio. Kappa-agreement between 3D three-directional VE MRI with retrospective valve tracking and echocardiography for classifying diastolic filling patterns was superior to 2D one-directional VE MRI and echocardiography (i.e., κ = 0.91 versus κ = 0.79, respectively). CONCLUSION: The 3D three-directional VE MRI with retrospective valve tracking better describes LV diastolic function as compared to 2D one-directional VE MRI in patients with ischemic heart failure.
PURPOSE: To compare parameters describing left ventricular (LV) diastolic function obtained with three-dimensional (3D) three-directional velocity-encoded (VE) MRI with retrospective valve tracking and two-dimensional (2D) one-directional VE MRI in patients with ischemic heart failure. Second, to compare classification of LV diastolic function, and in particular for discriminating restrictive filling patterns, with both MRI techniques versus Doppler echocardiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 3D and 2D VE MRI early (E) and atrial (A) peak flow rate indices, determined from transmitral waveform analyses, were compared. Also, net forward flow volume per cycle and transmitral regurgitation fraction were determined. Agreement in classifying diastolic filling patterns between 3D and 2D VE MRI versus Doppler echocardiography was evaluated using kappa statistics. RESULTS: The 3D three-directional VE MRI with retrospective valve tracking was statistically significantly different from 2D one-directional VE MRI for net forward flow volume and regurgitation fraction through the mitral valve and all parameters describing the diastolic waveform filling pattern, except for the E deceleration time and E/A filling ratio. Kappa-agreement between 3D three-directional VE MRI with retrospective valve tracking and echocardiography for classifying diastolic filling patterns was superior to 2D one-directional VE MRI and echocardiography (i.e., κ = 0.91 versus κ = 0.79, respectively). CONCLUSION: The 3D three-directional VE MRI with retrospective valve tracking better describes LV diastolic function as compared to 2D one-directional VE MRI in patients with ischemic heart failure.
Authors: Philip A Corrado; Andrew L Wentland; Jitka Starekova; Archana Dhyani; Kara N Goss; Oliver Wieben Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 7.034
Authors: Benjamin Fidock; Natasha Barker; Nithin Balasubramanian; Gareth Archer; Graham Fent; Abdullah Al-Mohammad; James Richardson; Laurence O'Toole; Norman Briffa; Alexander Rothman; Rob van der Geest; Rod Hose; James M Wild; Andrew J Swift; Pankaj Garg Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2019-08-02
Authors: Vivian P Kamphuis; Jos J M Westenberg; Roel L F van der Palen; Nico A Blom; Albert de Roos; Rob van der Geest; Mohammed S M Elbaz; Arno A W Roest Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Sohrab Fratz; Taylor Chung; Gerald F Greil; Margaret M Samyn; Andrew M Taylor; Emanuela R Valsangiacomo Buechel; Shi-Joon Yoo; Andrew J Powell Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Huub J van Eyk; Linda D van Schinkel; Vasudev Kantae; Charlotte E A Dronkers; Jos J M Westenberg; Albert de Roos; Hildo J Lamb; J Wouter Jukema; Amy C Harms; Thomas Hankemeier; Mario van der Stelt; Ingrid M Jazet; Patrick C N Rensen; Johannes W A Smit Journal: Nutr Diabetes Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 5.097