OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to assess the ability of phasecontrast MRI (PC-MRI) to detect sub-clinical age-related variations of left ventricular (LV) diastolic parameters and thus to provide age-related reference ranges currently available for echocardiography but not for MRI-PC, and to identify independent associates of such variations. METHODS: We studied 100 healthy volunteers (age = 42 ± 15years, 50 females) who had MRI with simultaneous blood pressure measurements. LV mass and volumes were assessed. Semiautomated analysis of PC-MRI data provided: 1) early transmitral (Ef) and atrial (Af) peak filling flow-rates (ml/s) and filling volume (FV), 2) deceleration time (DT), isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT), and 3) early myocardial longitudinal (E') peak velocity. RESULTS: MRI-PC diastolic parameters were reproducible as reflected by low coefficients of variations (ranged between 0.31 to 6.26 %). Peak myocardial velocity E' (r = -0.63, p < 0.0001) and flow-rate parameters were strongly and independently associated to age (Ef/Af:r = -0.63, DT:r = 0.46, IVRT:r = 0.44, Ef/FV:r = -0.55, Af/FV:r = 0.56, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, LV relaxation parameters (E', DT, IVRT), were independently associated to LV remodelling (LV mass/end-diastolic volume) and myocardial wall thickness (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PC-MRI age-related reference ranges of diastolic parameters are provided. Such parameters might be useful for a fast, reproducible and reliable characterization of diastolic function in patients referred for clinical MRI exam KEY POINTS: • MRI age-related reference values of left ventricular diastolic parameters are provided. • MRI diastolic parameters can characterise sub-clinical age-related variations in healthy individuals. • Diastolic function would complement cardiac MRI exam with currently neglected data. • Diastolic function would enhance MRI diagnostic value in cardiomyopathy and heartfailure.
OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to assess the ability of phasecontrast MRI (PC-MRI) to detect sub-clinical age-related variations of left ventricular (LV) diastolic parameters and thus to provide age-related reference ranges currently available for echocardiography but not for MRI-PC, and to identify independent associates of such variations. METHODS: We studied 100 healthy volunteers (age = 42 ± 15years, 50 females) who had MRI with simultaneous blood pressure measurements. LV mass and volumes were assessed. Semiautomated analysis of PC-MRI data provided: 1) early transmitral (Ef) and atrial (Af) peak filling flow-rates (ml/s) and filling volume (FV), 2) deceleration time (DT), isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT), and 3) early myocardial longitudinal (E') peak velocity. RESULTS: MRI-PC diastolic parameters were reproducible as reflected by low coefficients of variations (ranged between 0.31 to 6.26 %). Peak myocardial velocity E' (r = -0.63, p < 0.0001) and flow-rate parameters were strongly and independently associated to age (Ef/Af:r = -0.63, DT:r = 0.46, IVRT:r = 0.44, Ef/FV:r = -0.55, Af/FV:r = 0.56, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, LV relaxation parameters (E', DT, IVRT), were independently associated to LV remodelling (LV mass/end-diastolic volume) and myocardial wall thickness (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PC-MRI age-related reference ranges of diastolic parameters are provided. Such parameters might be useful for a fast, reproducible and reliable characterization of diastolic function in patients referred for clinical MRI exam KEY POINTS: • MRI age-related reference values of left ventricular diastolic parameters are provided. • MRI diastolic parameters can characterise sub-clinical age-related variations in healthy individuals. • Diastolic function would complement cardiac MRI exam with currently neglected data. • Diastolic function would enhance MRI diagnostic value in cardiomyopathy and heartfailure.
Authors: Graeme Carrick-Ranson; Jeffrey L Hastings; Paul S Bhella; Shigeki Shibata; Naoki Fujimoto; M Dean Palmer; Kara Boyd; Benjamin D Levine Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Joost Lumens; Tammo Delhaas; Theo Arts; Brett R Cowan; Alistair A Young Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2006-05-05 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Garvan C Kane; Barry L Karon; Douglas W Mahoney; Margaret M Redfield; Veronique L Roger; John C Burnett; Steven J Jacobsen; Richard J Rodeheffer Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: D W Kitzman; J M Gardin; J S Gottdiener; A Arnold; R Boineau; G Aurigemma; E K Marino; M Lyles; M Cushman; P L Enright Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2001-02-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Ronen Rubinshtein; James F Glockner; DaLi Feng; Philip A Araoz; Jacobo Kirsch; Imran S Syed; Jae K Oh Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2009-01-17 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Carlos Rivas-Gotz; Dirar S Khoury; Michael Manolios; Liyun Rao; Helen A Kopelen; Sherif F Nagueh Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Susan Cheng; Verônica R S Fernandes; David A Bluemke; Robyn L McClelland; Richard A Kronmal; João A C Lima Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-03-26 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Aseem Pradhan; John Scaringi; Patrick Gerard; Ross Arena; Jonathan Myers; Leonard A Kaminsky; Ethan Kung Journal: Cardiovasc Eng Technol Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 2.305
Authors: Corina Kräuter; Ursula Reiter; Clemens Reiter; Volha Nizhnikava; Marc Masana; Albrecht Schmidt; Michael Fuchsjäger; Rudolf Stollberger; Gert Reiter Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 4.668