Literature DB >> 21274227

Surgery for the arthritic knee.

A E Gross.   

Abstract

The optimal surgical procedure for the arthritic knee depends upon the type of arthritis and the patient. If the patient is 'high demand' (i.e., relatively active and young), and has incongruous arthritis (in either the medial or lateral compartments but not both), then realignment by osteotomy transfers the weight to the healthy compartment. If the osteotomy is successful, the patient may continue a physically demanding lifestyle. Knee replacement is indicated if the patient is 'low demand' (i.e., elderly or suffering from multiple joint disease) and has congruous arthritis, with destruction of both weight-bearing compartments. Knee replacement does not allow the same activity level as realignment but, fortunately, the low demand patient tends to have congruous disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis) and the high demand patient incongruous disease (e.g., osteoarthritis).

Entities:  

Year:  1985        PMID: 21274227      PMCID: PMC2327982     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  10 in total

1.  Infection after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  W Petty; R S Bryan; M B Coventry; L F Peterson
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Polycentric total knee arthroplasty. A ten-year follow-up study.

Authors:  D G Lewallen; R S Bryan; L F Peterson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Failed total knee arthroplasty. Revision and arthrodesis for infection and noninfectious complications.

Authors:  G W Woods; D R Lionberger; H S Tullos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The total condylar knee prosthesis in gonarthrosis. A five to nine-year follow-up of the first one hundred consecutive replacements.

Authors:  J N Insall; R W Hood; L B Flawn; D J Sullivan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The porous-coated anatomic total knee.

Authors:  D S Hungerford; R V Kenna; K A Krackow
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  The evolution of knee arthroplasty. Results with three generations of prostheses.

Authors:  J W Oglesby; F C Wilson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Management of infected total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  R H Walker; D J Schurman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Revision of total knee replacement.

Authors:  H U Cameron; G A Hunter; R P Welsh; W H Bailey
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J N Insall; F M Thompson; B D Brause
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Arthrodesis of the knee following failed total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M P Brodersen; R H Fitzgerald; L F Peterson; M B Coventry; R S Bryan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.284

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.