Literature DB >> 7272860

Revision of total knee replacement.

H U Cameron, G A Hunter, R P Welsh, W H Bailey.   

Abstract

In the London and Toronto areas between 1969 and 1978, 597 patients had 661 cemented knee replacements. Eighty-nine (13.5%) prostheses failed; 73 of them were revised. Nineteen (2.9%) failed primarily because of infection. The revised replacements were examined and rated using a modification of the British rating system. The overall results of revision were excellent or good in 30% and fair or poor in 52%. Fusion was attempted in two patients after revision. In 16 patients with failed replacements that were not revised, fusion was attempted in 9; 4 of the 16 patients had amputation. The results of failure in knee replacement surgery are similar to those of hip replacement, but are helped considerably by lower patient expectation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7272860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  3 in total

1.  Surgery for the arthritic knee.

Authors:  A E Gross
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Causes of Aseptic Persistent Pain after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hong-An Lim; Eun-Kyoo Song; Jong-Keun Seon; Kyung-Soon Park; Young-Joo Shin; Hong-Yeol Yang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-02-13

3.  Minimum Two-year Results of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Infectious or Non-infectious Causes.

Authors:  Kyoung-Jai Lee; Jae-Young Moon; Eun-Kyoo Song; Hong-An Lim; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.