| Literature DB >> 21272305 |
Maja Jakesevic1, Kjersti Aaby, Grethe-Iren A Borge, Bengt Jeppsson, Siv Ahrné, Göran Molin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) in the intestines is an inflammatory condition which activates leukocytes and reactive oxygen species (ROS) and leads to lipid peroxidation and DNA damage. Bilberry and chokeberry fruits are rich sources of polyphenols which may act as antioxidants and prevent lipid peroxidation. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) may improve microbial status in the intestines and increase the metabolic activity towards polyphenolic degradation. The aim of the study was to clarify antioxidative effects of bilberry and chokeberry fruits alone and with addition of a LAB-strain, Lactobacillus plantarum HEAL19, in an I/R-model in mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21272305 PMCID: PMC3038167 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Figure 1Lactobacilli count of colonic mucosal tissue of mice after intestinal ischemia-reperfusion. Viable count of lactobacilli of colonic mucosal tissue of mice administrated billberry (B), chokeberry (Ar) and/or strain Lactobacillus plantarum HEAL19 (LplH19). Lactobacilli count significantly decreased in Ar-group (**p = 0.008) and B-group (**p = 0.002) compared to LplH19-group. The count was higher in groups supplemented with LplH19 strain and significantly higher when LplH19 was added to chokeberry (Ar+LplH19-group) compared to only chokeberry-fed mice (Ar-group; #p = 0.029). Median values are indicated by the transverse line within the box and the top and bottom lines of each box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles.
Figure 2Effects of experimental diets on lipid peroxidation in colon after intestinal ischemia-reperfusion. The figure shows effects of billberry (B), chokeberry (Ar) and/or strain Lactobacillus plantarum HEAL19 (LplH19) administration on lipid peroxidation in colonic tissue. Significant decrease of lipid peroxidation (MDA) was observed in B-group (*p = 0.030), B+LplH19-group (*p = 0.021) and I/R-sham (*p = 0.014) compared to the I/R-control. A significantly lower MDA-value was also noted in B-group compared to Ar-group (#p = 0.016). Median values are indicated by the transverse line within the box and the top and bottom lines of each box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles.
Concentrations (μg/g) of anthocyanins in caecum and colon of mice administrated billberry (B) or chokeberry (Ar) alone or supplemented with strain L. plantarum HEAL19 (LplH19)
| Comp. | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| caecum | colon | caecum | colon | caecum | colon | caecum | colon | |
| 1.54 | 4.4* | 0.96 | 2.58* | - | - | - | - | |
| (0.84-1.92) | (1.82-4.8) | (0.7-1.38) | (1.92-3.56) | |||||
| 1.04 | 2.7* | 0.79 | 1.66* | - | - | - | - | |
| (0.72-1.22) | (1.28-3.21) | (0.52-0.96) | (1.3-2.4) | |||||
| 2.94 | 9.44** | 2.28 | 8.75** | - | - | - | - | |
| (2.23-3.35) | (7.64-12.54) | (1.8-3.05) | (6.5-12.78) | |||||
| - | - | - | - | 6.43 | 13.03** | 5.09 | 12.27*** | |
| (4.86-7.86) | (10.8-24.9) | (3.85-6.4) | (7.27-14.1) | |||||
| 0.51 | 1.04* | 0.46 | 0.72 | - | - | - | - | |
| (0.47-0.63) | (0.7-1.18) | (0.44-0.48) | (0.56-1.17) | |||||
| 0.97 | 2.96** | 0.8 | 1.61** | 5.4a | 12.16** b | 4.34c | 9.97*** d | |
| (0.75-1.1) | (1.83-3.16) | (0.58-0.96) | (1.3-1.84) | (3.96-6.24) | (9.1-23.34) | (2.65-5.4) | (6.41-12.8) | |
| - | - | - | - | 0.53 | 1.36** | 0.48 | 2.06*** | |
| (0.46-0.56) | (0.98-4.34) | (0.46-0.56) | (1.19-2.9) | |||||
| nd | 1.12 | nd | 0.91 | - | - | - | - | |
| (0.68-1.42) | (0.54-1.28) | |||||||
| 0.75 | 1.34 | nd | 0.74* | - | - | - | - | |
| (0.7-0.8) | (0.74-1.47) | (0.71-1.16) | ||||||
| 0.76 | 4.61** | 0.6 | 3.04 | - | - | - | - | |
| (0.68-1.03) | (2.33-8.0) | (0.52-0.68) | (1.38-8.9) | |||||
| nd | 0.85 | nd | 0.72 | - | - | - | - | |
| (0.64-1.06) | (0.72-0.72) | |||||||
| nd | 1.24 | nd | 1.00 | - | - | - | - | |
| (1.03-46.0) | (0.61-31.75) | |||||||
| 5.42 | 20.92* | 4.38 | 16.76** | - | - | - | - | |
| (2.81-6.34) | (13.27-25.55) | (2.21-5.09) | (16.02-23.2) | |||||
* denotes p < 0.05 compared to the caecum sample of the same treatment group; ** denotes p < 0.01 compared to the caecum sample of the same treatment group; *** denotes p < 0.001 compared to the caecum sample of the same treatment group; a denotes p < 0.001 compared to the caecum of B-group; b denotes p < 0.01 compared to the colon of B-group; c denotes p < 0.01 compared to the caecum of B+LplH19-group; d denotes p < 0.001 compared to the colon of B+LplH19-group; nd = not detected. Values are expressed as medians (25th and 75th percentiles).
Aromatic acid metabolites detected in caecum and colon of mice administrated billberry (B) or chokeberry (Ar) alone or supplemented with strain L. plantarum HEAL19 (LplH19)
| Rt (min) | Molecular mass | Parent ions ([M-H]-, | Product ions ( | Compound | Detection site and group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168 | 167 | 123 | 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid | Caecum and colon B and B+LplH19 | |
| 168 | 167 | 123 | 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid | Caecum and colon B and B+LplH19 | |
| 224 | 223 | 123 | Not identified I | Caecum and colon B and B+LplH19 | |
| 224 | 223 | 123 | Not identified II | Colon B and B+LplH19 | |
| 224 | 223 | 123 | Not identified III | Colon B and B+LplH19 | |
| 152 | 151 | 107 | 4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid | Caecum Ar and Ar+LplH19 | |
| 152 | 151 | 107 | 3-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid | Colon Ar and Ar+LplH19 | |
| 290 | 289 | 271 | Non identified EC | Colon B and B+LplH19 | |
| 191 | 190 | 146 | Non identified | Caecum and colon B, B+LplH19, Ar,Ar+Lp19 | |
| 166 | 165 | 121 | 3-Hydroxyphenylpropionic acid | Caecum and colon B and B+LplH19 | |
Concentrations (μg/g) of aromatic acid metabolites in caecum and colon of mice administrated billberry (B) or chokeberry (Ar) alone or supplemented with strain L. plantarum HEAL19 (LplH19)
| Compound | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| caecum | colon | caecum | colon | caecum | colon | caecum | colon | |
| diHPA | 73.3 | 70.1 | 79.2 | 66.0 | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| isomer I | (68-101.6) | (55.2-96.8) | (57.3-87.7) | (41.5-87.9) | ||||
| diHPA | 150.9 | 63 | 112.5 | 73.8 | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| isomer II | (88.9-229.6) | (54-155.7) | (87.3-137.8) | (31.6-89.6) | ||||
| Ni I | 29.9 | 34.2 | 22.7 | 33.8 | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| (27.2-45.8) | (33.7-44.3) | (22.7-22.7) | (33.8-33.8) | |||||
| Ni II | nd | 19.3 | nd | 18.0 | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| (18.3-26.3) | (18.0-18.0) | |||||||
| Ni III | nd | 33.2 | nd | 31.4 | ||||
| (29.1-41.7) | (13.8-58.4) | |||||||
| 4-HPA | nd | nd | nd | nd | 59.3 | Nd | 66.0 | Nd |
| (49.3-85.6) | (61.9-83.0) | |||||||
| 3-HPA | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | 42.6 | nd | 32.9 |
| (29.7-143.9) | (22.7-43.1) | |||||||
| Ni EC | nd | 12.6 | nd | 11.5 | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| (10.6-17.1) | (9.3-19.1) | |||||||
| 3-HPP | 310.2 | 124.6 | 258.4 | 159.1 | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| (209.7-360.1) | (84-141.6) | (129.9-340.9) | (128.8-186.9) | |||||
nd = not detected, Ni = not identified. Values are expressed as medians (25th and 75th percentiles).