Literature DB >> 21271041

Implant/abutment vertical misfit of one-piece cast frameworks made with different materials.

Gustavo Augusto Seabra Barbosa1, Flávio Domingues das Neves, Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos, Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues, Ricardo Faria Ribeiro.   

Abstract

This study compared vertical and passive fit of one-piece cast frameworks made with 3 different materials: commercially pure titanium (CP Ti - G1), cobalt-chromium alloy (Co-Cr - G2) and nickel-chromium-titanium alloy (Ni-Cr-Ti - G3). Fifteen frameworks were obtained simulating bars for fixed prosthesis in a model with 5 implants. The passive and vertical fit of the framework interface was measured using an optical microscope at x30 magnification. Data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and LSD tests (α=0.05). Mean and standard deviation values for passive fit and vertical fit were, respectively: G1 [472.49 (109.88) µm and 29.9 (13.24) µm], G2 [584.84 (120.20) µm and 27.05 (10.30) µm], and G3 [462.70 (179.18) µm and 24.95 (11.14) µm]. For vertical fit, there were no significant differences among G1, G2 and G3 (p=0.285). There were no significant differences for passive fit between G1 and G3 (p=0.844), but both differed significantly from G2 (p=0.028 and p=0.035, respectively), which showed the highest misfit values. It may be concluded that the vertical fit of frameworks was not affected by the tested materials, and that one-piece cast frameworks resulted in inadequate passive fit. The Co-Cr alloy presented the worst values for passive fit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21271041     DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000600006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  7 in total

1.  Prosthodontic Management of Unfavourably Positioned Implants.

Authors:  P R Ganesh; G Madhan
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-02-05

2.  Analytical and experimental position stability of the abutment in different dental implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection.

Authors:  Wiebke Semper-Hogg; Silvan Kraft; Sebastian Stiller; Juergen Mehrhof; Katja Nelson
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Abutment misfit in implant-supported prostheses manufactured by casting technique: An integrative review.

Authors:  Lorena M S Pereira; Mariane B Sordi; Ricardo S Magini; Antônio R Calazans Duarte; Júlio C M Souza
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

4.  Influence of Filler Metal on Electrochemical Characteristics of a Laser-Welded CoCrMoW Alloy Used in Prosthodontics.

Authors:  Lukasz Reimann; Zbigniew Brytan; Grzegorz Jania
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.748

5.  Effect of tightening torque on the marginal adaptation of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Jalil Ghanbarzadeh; Hossin Dashti; Reza Karamad; Marzieh Alikhasi; Mohammadreza Nakhaei
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

6.  A new portable vibrator for plaster pouring: effect on the marginal fit at cylinder-abutment.

Authors:  Pâmela Cândida Aires Ribas de Andrade; Leonardo Flores Luthi; Kyle Stanley; Antônio Carlos Cardoso
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Effect of joining the sectioned implant-supported prosthesis on the peri-implant strain generated in simulated mandibular model.

Authors:  Ipsha Singh; K Chandrasekharan Nair; Jayakar Shetty
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.