Literature DB >> 26199516

Prosthodontic Management of Unfavourably Positioned Implants.

P R Ganesh1, G Madhan2.   

Abstract

The success rate of implant therapy has improved up to 90-95 %. This can be attributed to a numerous factors namely proper case selection, improved diagnostic and radiographic techniques, good softwares for treatment planning, improved surgical equipments, good surgical techniques and sophisticated implant design. The cost of advanced diagnostic techniques and treatment planning software can sometime limit them from being used routinely. In such unfortunate situations, older technique of exposing the ridge and placing implants wherever possible without regard for favorable implant position or angulation is still being followed. This case report describes prosthetic rehabilitation of a partially edentulous patient who was abandoned by a general practitioner after implant placement. Five implants had been placed in the maxilla in prosthetically unfavorable positions and angulations. Castable abutments were then used and a single bar was cast. This bar was then incorporated in a FP3 type of a fixed maxillary prosthesis opposing existing fixed partial denture in the lower jaw. 1 year follow up shows stable implants, healthy peri-implant tissue, minimal probing depth and no radiographic evidence of pathology.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 26199516      PMCID: PMC4502001          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-013-0254-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  12 in total

1.  One-stage operative procedure using two different implant systems: a prospective study on implant overdentures in the edentulous mandible.

Authors:  A Tawse-Smith; C Perio; A G Payne; R Kumara; W M Thomson
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.932

2.  Design of a cast bar reinforced provisional restoration for the management of the interim phase in implant dentistry.

Authors:  S Saba
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Dental imaging in implant treatment planning.

Authors:  Hsun-Liang Chan; Kelly Misch; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.454

4.  Full-arch metal-resin cement- and screw-retained provisional restoration for immediately loaded implants.

Authors:  Mirza Rustum Baig; Gunaseelan Rajan
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Success rate of immediate nonfunctional loaded single-tooth implants: immediate versus delayed implantation.

Authors:  Fernando Salimon Ribeiro; Ana Emília Farias Pontes; Elcio Marcantonio; Adriano Piattelli; Rodolfo Jorge Boeck Neto; Elcio Marcantonio
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.454

6.  Computer-aided dental implant planning.

Authors:  Leonard Spector
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2008-10

7.  The effect of soldering, electrowelding, and cast-to procedures on the accuracy of fit of cast implant bars.

Authors:  P C Zoidis; S Winkler; N D Karellos
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.454

8.  Syncrystallization: a technique for temporization of immediately loaded implants with metal-reinforced acrylic resin restorations.

Authors:  Marco Degidi; Peter Gehrke; Andre Spanel; Adriano Piattelli
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.932

9.  Treatment planning for dental implants: considerations, indications, and contraindications.

Authors:  T Tanner
Journal:  Dent Update       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug

10.  Clinical performance of provisional screw-retained metal-free acrylic restorations in an immediate loading implant protocol: a 242 consecutive patients' report.

Authors:  Jose-María Suarez-Feito; Alberto Sicilia; Jorge Angulo; Subir Banerji; Isabel Cuesta; Brian Millar
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.977

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.