Earl S Ford1, Guixiang Zhao, James Tsai, Chaoyang Li. 1. Division of Adult and Community Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. eford@cdc.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whether concentrations of vitamin D are related to mortality remains unresolved. Our objective was to examine the relationship between serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and all-cause mortality in a national sample of US adults. METHODS: We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Mortality Study from 2001 to 2004 with mortality compiled through 2006. Mortality status was established through a match to the National Death Index. RESULTS: Of the 7531 participants, 347 died. Median follow-up was 3.8 years. The mean unadjusted concentrations of vitamin D were 54.1 nmol/l (21.7 ng/ml) among participants who died and 60.7 nmol/l (24.3 ng/ml) among participants who survived (P = 0.002). After adjustment for socio-demographic factors, the hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality were 1.65 [95% confidence interval (CI): 95% CI: 1.13-2.40] for participants with a concentration <50 nmol/l (<20 ng/ml) and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.74-1.41) for participants with a concentration of 50 to <75 nmol/l (20 to <30 ng/ml) compared with participants who had a concentration of ≥ 75 nmol/l (≥ 30 ng/ml). After more extensive adjustment, the HRs were 1.28 (95% CI: 0.86-1.90) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.63-1.33), respectively. The fully adjusted HR per 10 nmol/l of vitamin D was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86-1.01). The HRs did not vary by gender (P = 0.80) or among the three major racial or ethnic groups (P = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Concentrations of vitamin D were weakly and inversely related to all-cause mortality in this sample of US adults.
BACKGROUND: Whether concentrations of vitamin D are related to mortality remains unresolved. Our objective was to examine the relationship between serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and all-cause mortality in a national sample of US adults. METHODS: We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Mortality Study from 2001 to 2004 with mortality compiled through 2006. Mortality status was established through a match to the National Death Index. RESULTS: Of the 7531 participants, 347 died. Median follow-up was 3.8 years. The mean unadjusted concentrations of vitamin D were 54.1 nmol/l (21.7 ng/ml) among participants who died and 60.7 nmol/l (24.3 ng/ml) among participants who survived (P = 0.002). After adjustment for socio-demographic factors, the hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality were 1.65 [95% confidence interval (CI): 95% CI: 1.13-2.40] for participants with a concentration <50 nmol/l (<20 ng/ml) and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.74-1.41) for participants with a concentration of 50 to <75 nmol/l (20 to <30 ng/ml) compared with participants who had a concentration of ≥ 75 nmol/l (≥ 30 ng/ml). After more extensive adjustment, the HRs were 1.28 (95% CI: 0.86-1.90) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.63-1.33), respectively. The fully adjusted HR per 10 nmol/l of vitamin D was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86-1.01). The HRs did not vary by gender (P = 0.80) or among the three major racial or ethnic groups (P = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Concentrations of vitamin D were weakly and inversely related to all-cause mortality in this sample of US adults.
Authors: Cedric F Garland; June Jiwon Kim; Sharif Burgette Mohr; Edward Doerr Gorham; William B Grant; Edward L Giovannucci; Leo Baggerly; Heather Hofflich; Joe Wesley Ramsdell; Kenneth Zeng; Robert P Heaney Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Louie Mar A Gangcuangco; Dominic C Chow; Chin-Yuan Liang; Beau K Nakamoto; Tracie M Umaki; Kalpana J Kallianpur; Cecilia M Shikuma Journal: Hawaii J Med Public Health Date: 2013-06
Authors: Christopher T Sempos; Ramón A Durazo-Arvizu; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Elizabeth A Yetley; Anne C Looker; Rosemary L Schleicher; Guichan Cao; Vicki Burt; Holly Kramer; Regan L Bailey; Johanna T Dwyer; Xinli Zhang; Jaime Gahche; Paul M Coates; Mary Frances Picciano Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 5.958