Literature DB >> 21265763

Ploidy and gene conversion in Archaea.

Jörg Soppa1.   

Abstract

The genome copy numbers of seven crenarchaeal species of four genera have been reported. All of them are monoploid and thus this seems to be a characteristic feature of Crenarchaeota. In stark contrast, none of six species representing six euryarchaeal genera is monoploid. Therefore Euryarchaea are typically oligoploid or polyploidy and their genome copy numbers are tightly regulated in response to growth phase and/or growth rate. A theoretical consideration called 'Muller's ratchet' predicts that asexually reproducing polyploid species should not be able to exist. An escape from Muller's ratchet would be a mechanism leading to the equalization of genome copies, such as gene conversion. Using two species of methanogenic and halophilic archaea, it was shown that heterozygous cells containing different genomes simultaneously can be selected, exemplifying gene redundancy as one possible evolutionary advantage of polyploidy. In both cases, the genomes were rapidly equalized in the absence of selection, showing that gene conversion operates at least in halophilic and methanogenic Euryarchaea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21265763     DOI: 10.1042/BST0390150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans        ISSN: 0300-5127            Impact factor:   5.407


  25 in total

Review 1.  The evolutionary significance of polyploidy.

Authors:  Yves Van de Peer; Eshchar Mizrachi; Kathleen Marchal
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Archaeal DNA Replication.

Authors:  Mark D Greci; Stephen D Bell
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 15.500

Review 3.  Emerging views of genome organization in Archaea.

Authors:  Naomichi Takemata; Stephen D Bell
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Essentiality of the glnA gene in Haloferax mediterranei: gene conversion and transcriptional analysis.

Authors:  V Rodríguez-Herrero; G Payá; V Bautista; A Vegara; M Cortés-Molina; M Camacho; J Esclapez; M J Bonete
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Nonsense suppression in archaea.

Authors:  Arpita Bhattacharya; Caroline Köhrer; Debabrata Mandal; Uttam L RajBhandary
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Whole-genome comparison between the type strain of Halobacterium salinarum (DSM 3754T ) and the laboratory strains R1 and NRC-1.

Authors:  Friedhelm Pfeiffer; Gerald Losensky; Anita Marchfelder; Bianca Habermann; Mike Dyall-Smith
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Nanobody(R)-based chromatin immunoprecipitation/micro-array analysis for genome-wide identification of transcription factor DNA binding sites.

Authors:  Trong Nguyen-Duc; Eveline Peeters; Serge Muyldermans; Daniel Charlier; Gholamreza Hassanzadeh-Ghassabeh
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Functional genomic and advanced genetic studies reveal novel insights into the metabolism, regulation, and biology of Haloferax volcanii.

Authors:  Jörg Soppa
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.273

9.  A comprehensive analysis of the importance of translation initiation factors for Haloferax volcanii applying deletion and conditional depletion mutants.

Authors:  Katrin Gäbel; Jessica Schmitt; Sebastian Schulz; Daniela J Näther; Jörg Soppa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  DNA as a phosphate storage polymer and the alternative advantages of polyploidy for growth or survival.

Authors:  Karolin Zerulla; Scott Chimileski; Daniela Näther; Uri Gophna; R Thane Papke; Jörg Soppa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.