Literature DB >> 21264727

The development and validation of sensory and emotional scales of touch perception.

Steve Guest1, Jean Marc Dessirier, Anahit Mehrabyan, Francis McGlone, Greg Essick, George Gescheider, Anne Fontana, Rui Xiong, Rochelle Ackerley, Kevin Blot.   

Abstract

No comprehensive language exists that describes the experience of touch. Three experiments were conducted to take steps toward establishing a touch lexicon. In Experiment I, 49 participants rated how well 262 adjectives described sensory, emotional and evaluative aspects of touch. In Experiment II, participants rated pairwise dissimilarities of the most descriptive words of the set. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) solutions representing semantic-perceptual spaces underlying the words resulted in a touch perception task (TPT) consisting of 26 'sensory' attributes (e.g., bumpiness) and 14 'emotional' attributes (e.g., pleasurable). In Experiment III, 40 participants used the TPT to rate unseen textured materials that were moved actively or received passively against the index fingerpad, volar forearm, and two underarm sites. MDS confirmed similar semantic-perceptual structures in Experiments II and III. Factor analysis of Experiment III data decomposed the sensory attribute ratings into factors labeled Roughness, Slip, Pile and Firmness, and the emotional attribute ratings into Comfort and Arousal factors. Factor scores varied among materials and sites. Greater intensity of sensory and emotional responses were reported when participants passively, as opposed to actively, received stimuli. The sensitivity of the TPT in identifying body site and mode of touch-related perceptual differences affirms the validity and utility of this novel linguistic/perceptual tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264727     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-010-0037-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  34 in total

1.  Emotional visual stimuli affect the evaluation of tactile stimuli presented on the arms but not the related electrodermal responses.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Massimiliano Zampini; Georgiana Juravle; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Perceptual and neural response to affective tactile texture stimulation in adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Carissa J Cascio; Estephan J Moana-Filho; Steve Guest; Mary Beth Nebel; Jonathan Weisner; Grace T Baranek; Gregory K Essick
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 5.216

3.  Self-reported Pleasantness Ratings and Examiner-Coded Defensiveness in Response to Touch in Children with ASD: Effects of Stimulus Material and Bodily Location.

Authors:  Carissa J Cascio; Jill Lorenzi; Grace T Baranek
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-05

4.  Haptic aesthetics in the blind: A behavioral and fMRI investigation.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Lora T Likova
Journal:  IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging       Date:  2018

5.  The arousing power of everyday materials: an analysis of the physiological and behavioral responses to visually and tactually presented textures.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  An fMRI study on cortical responses during active self-touch and passive touch from others.

Authors:  Rochelle Ackerley; Eusra Hassan; Andrew Curran; Johan Wessberg; Håkan Olausson; Francis McGlone
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 7.  Tactile C fibers and their contributions to pleasant sensations and to tactile allodynia.

Authors:  Jaquette Liljencrantz; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Function Follows Form: Using the Aesthetic Association Principle to Enhance Haptic Interface Design.

Authors:  Stefan Josef Breitschaft; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-05

9.  Active Interpersonal Touch Gives Rise to the Social Softness Illusion.

Authors:  Antje Gentsch; Elena Panagiotopoulou; Aikaterini Fotopoulou
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Quantifying the sensory and emotional perception of touch: differences between glabrous and hairy skin.

Authors:  Rochelle Ackerley; Karin Saar; Francis McGlone; Helena Backlund Wasling
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.