Literature DB >> 21264705

Irrelevant objects of expertise compete with faces during visual search.

Rankin W McGugin1, Thomas J McKeeff, Frank Tong, Isabel Gauthier.   

Abstract

Prior work suggests that nonface objects of expertise can interfere with the perception of faces when the two categories are alternately presented, suggesting competition for shared perceptual resources. Here, we ask whether task-irrelevant distractors from a category of expertise compete when faces are presented in a standard visual search task. Participants searched for a target (face or sofa) in an array containing both relevant and irrelevant distractors. The number of distractors from the target category (face or sofa) remained constant, whereas the number of distractors from the irrelevant category (cars) varied. Search slopes, calculated as a function of the number of irrelevant cars, were correlated with car expertise. The effect was not due to car distractors grabbing attention, because they did not compete with sofa targets. Objects of expertise interfere with face perception even when they are task irrelevant, visually distinct, and separated in space from faces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264705      PMCID: PMC3044323          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-010-0006-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  45 in total

1.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition.

Authors:  I Gauthier; P Skudlarski; J C Gore; A W Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Visual search for a socially defined feature: what causes the search asymmetry favoring cross-race faces?

Authors:  D T Levin; B L Angelone
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

3.  Selective interference on the holistic processing of faces in working memory.

Authors:  Olivia S Cheung; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Is object search mediated by object-based or image-based representations?

Authors:  Fiona N Newell; Valerie Brown; John M Findlay
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2004

5.  Individual differences in FFA activity suggest independent processing at different spatial scales.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Kim M Curby; Pawel Skudlarski; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Neural mechanisms of expert skills in visual working memory.

Authors:  Christopher D Moore; Michael X Cohen; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  A neural basis for expert object recognition.

Authors:  J W Tanaka; T Curran
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-01

9.  EPS Mid-Career Award 2004: brain mechanisms of attention.

Authors:  John Duncan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Engagement of fusiform cortex and disengagement of lateral occipital cortex in the acquisition of radiological expertise.

Authors:  Erin M Harley; Whitney B Pope; J Pablo Villablanca; Jeanette Mumford; Robert Suh; John C Mazziotta; Dieter Enzmann; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  12 in total

1.  The Vanderbilt Expertise Test reveals domain-general and domain-specific sex effects in object recognition.

Authors:  Rankin W McGugin; Jennifer J Richler; Grit Herzmann; Magen Speegle; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Experience moderates overlap between object and face recognition, suggesting a common ability.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Rankin W McGugin; Jennifer J Richler; Grit Herzmann; Magen Speegle; Ana E Van Gulick
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Expertise Effects in Face-Selective Areas are Robust to Clutter and Diverted Attention, but not to Competition.

Authors:  Rankin Williams McGugin; Ana E Van Gulick; Benjamin J Tamber-Rosenau; David A Ross; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Processing multiple visual objects is limited by overlap in neural channels.

Authors:  Michael A Cohen; Talia Konkle; Juliana Y Rhee; Ken Nakayama; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Emergence of the benefits and costs of grouping for visual search.

Authors:  Rachel Wu; Brianna McGee; Madelyn Rubenstein; Zoe Pruitt; Olivia S Cheung; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Expertise increases the functional overlap between face and object perception.

Authors:  Thomas J McKeeff; Rankin W McGugin; Frank Tong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-10-08

7.  Interference in character processing reflects common perceptual expertise across writing systems.

Authors:  Alan C-N Wong; Zhiyi Qu; Rankin W McGugin; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Robust expertise effects in right FFA.

Authors:  Rankin Williams McGugin; Allen T Newton; John C Gore; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Holding a stick at both ends: on faces and expertise.

Authors:  Assaf Harel; Dwight J Kravitz; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Interference between face and non-face domains of perceptual expertise: a replication and extension.

Authors:  Kim M Curby; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.