Literature DB >> 27900585

Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval.

Jennifer C Weeks1,2, Lynn Hasher3,4.   

Abstract

Older adults show implicit memory for previously seen distraction, an effect attributed to poor attentional control. It is unclear whether this effect results from lack of control over encoding during the distraction task, lack of retrieval constraint during the test task, or both. In the present study, we simulated poor distraction control in young adults using divided attention at encoding, at retrieval, at both times, or not at all. The encoding task was a 1-back task on pictures with distracting superimposed letter strings, some of which were words. The retrieval task was a word fragment completion task testing implicit memory for the distracting words. Attention was divided using an auditory odd digit detection task. Dividing attention at encoding, but not at retrieval, resulted in significant priming for distraction, which suggests that control over encoding processes is a primary determinant of distraction transfer in populations with low inhibitory control (e.g. older adults).

Keywords:  Distraction; Divided attention; Inhibition; Priming

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27900585     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1210-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  41 in total

1.  Interference effects from divided attention during retrieval in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Myra A Fernandes; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2003-06

2.  Implicit proactive interference, age, and automatic versus controlled retrieval strategies.

Authors:  Simay Ikier; Lixia Yang; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-05

3.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.

Authors:  F I Craik; R Govoni; M Naveh-Benjamin; N D Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-06

4.  Divided attention and indirect memory tests.

Authors:  N W Mulligan; M Hartman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

5.  Divided attention can enhance memory encoding: the attentional boost effect in implicit memory.

Authors:  Pietro Spataro; Neil W Mulligan; Clelia Rossi-Arnaud
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The role of working memory in visual selective attention.

Authors:  J W de Fockert; G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

8.  Age-related differences in enhancement and suppression of neural activity underlying selective attention in matched young and old adults.

Authors:  A E Haring; T Y Zhuravleva; B R Alperin; D M Rentz; P J Holcomb; K R Daffner
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Cultural differences in visual attention: Implications for distraction processing.

Authors:  Tarek Amer; K W Joan Ngo; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2016-03-06

10.  The disruptive - and beneficial - effects of distraction on older adults' cognitive performance.

Authors:  Jennifer C Weeks; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  Age differences in vulnerability to distraction under arousal.

Authors:  Sara N Gallant; Kelly A Durbin; Mara Mather
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2020-08

2.  Neural correlates of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Authors:  Alana Muller; Lindsey A Sirianni; Richard J Addante
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.386

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.