Literature DB >> 23371792

On the importance of looking back: the role of recursive remindings in recency judgments and cued recall.

Larry L Jacoby1, Christopher N Wahlheim.   

Abstract

Suppose that you were asked which of two movies you had most recently seen. The results of the experiments reported here suggest that your answer would be more accurate if, when viewing the later movie, you were reminded of the earlier one. In the present experiments, we investigated the role of remindings in recency judgments and cued-recall performance. We did this by presenting a list composed of two instances from each of several different categories and later asking participants to select (Exp. 1) or to recall (Exp. 2) the more recently presented instance. Reminding was manipulated by varying instructions to look back over memory of earlier instances during the presentation of later instances. As compared to a control condition, cued-recall performance revealed facilitation effects when remindings occurred and were later recollected, but interference effects in their absence. The effects of reminding on recency judgments paralleled those on cued recall of more recently presented instances. We interpret these results as showing that reminding produces a recursive representation that embeds memory for an earlier-presented category instance into that of a later-presented one and, thereby, preserves their temporal order. Large individual differences in the probabilities of remindings and of their later recollection were observed. The widespread importance of recursive reminding for theory and for applied purposes is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23371792     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0298-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Judgment of frequency versus recognition confidence: repetition and recursive reminding.

Authors:  Douglas L Hintzman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

2.  The process-dissociation approach two decades later: convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

3.  Proactive inhibition as a function of time and degree of prior learning.

Authors:  B J UNDERWOOD
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1949-02

4.  How does repetition affect memory? Evidence from judgments of recency.

Authors:  Douglas L Hintzman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-01

5.  The spacing effect depends on an encoding deficit, retrieval, and time in working memory: evidence from once-presented words.

Authors:  K Braun; D C Rubin
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1998-01

6.  Encoding processes and the spacing effect.

Authors:  F S Bellezza; H B Winkler; F Andrasik
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-07

Review 7.  Research Strategy in the Study of Memory: Fads, Fallacies, and the Search for the "Coordinates of Truth".

Authors:  Douglas L Hintzman
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-05

8.  Remembering change: the critical role of recursive remindings in proactive effects of memory.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-01

9.  Why am I remembering this now? Predicting the occurrence of involuntary (spontaneous) episodic memories.

Authors:  Dorthe Berntsen; Søren Risløv Staugaard; Louise Maria Torp Sørensen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-07-02

10.  Reminding as a basis for temporal judgments.

Authors:  E Winograd; R M Soloway
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  16 in total

1.  Memory for flip-flopping: detection and recollection of political contradictions.

Authors:  Adam L Putnam; Christopher N Wahlheim; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-10

2.  The role of retrieval during study: Evidence of reminding from self-paced study time.

Authors:  Geoffrey L McKinley; Brian H Ross; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-07

3.  Testing can counteract proactive interference by integrating competing information.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-01

4.  Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: The mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format.

Authors:  Magdalena Abel; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-01

Review 5.  Prospective and retrospective duration memory in the hippocampus: is time in the foreground or background?

Authors:  Christopher J MacDonald
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Relating the content and confidence of recognition judgments.

Authors:  Diana Selmeczy; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Memory guides the processing of event changes for older and younger adults.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-07-09

8.  Characterizing adult age differences in the initiation and organization of retrieval: A further investigation of retrieval dynamics in dual-list free recall.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim; Lauren L Richmond; Mark J Huff; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-11

9.  The role of detection and recollection of change in list discrimination.

Authors:  Larry L Jacoby; Christopher N Wahlheim; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-07

10.  Age differences in the focus of retrieval: Evidence from dual-list free recall.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim; Mark J Huff
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.