Literature DB >> 21258820

[Levobupivacaine vs. ropivacaine for continuous femoral analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

M Schuster1, L Engelhardt, W Erler, B Dienert, M Wagner, J Birnbaum, T Volk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine are both used for continuous femoral analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; however it is unknown whether both drugs are equally effective regarding pain control, preservation of mobility and patient satisfaction. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled trial 84 patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with quadruple hamstring tendons were studied. For postoperative pain therapy levobupivacaine 0.125%, ropivacaine 0.2% or placebo control with NaCl 0.9% at a rate of 6 ml/h were used for 48 h using a femoral nerve catheter. All patients also received an i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) pump with piritramide.
RESULTS: Patient satisfaction was significantly higher and night rest was better in both treatment groups compared to the placebo group but there appeared to be no major differences between the two local anesthetics. Opioid consumption was significantly higher in the placebo group compared to the levobupivacaine group but not the ropivacaine group. The pain scores showed a trend towards higher scores in the placebo group throughout but the difference only reached statistical significance on postoperative day 1. No statistical significant differences in motor block were found between the three groups.
CONCLUSION: Postoperative analgesia for ACL reconstruction during the first 48 h using femoral block with a continuous infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% or ropivacaine 0.2% in combination with an IVPCA is similarly effective and better than a placebo. Both studied drugs seem to be equally appropriate for this purpose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21258820     DOI: 10.1007/s00482-010-1006-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  19 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 2.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Robert J Johnson; Joseph A Abate; Braden C Fleming; Claude E Nichols
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Pre- versus postoperative intraarticular application of local anesthetics and opioids versus femoral nerve block in anterior cruciate ligament repair.

Authors:  Hermann O Mayr; Elmar Entholzner; Robert Hube; Werner Hein; Thomas G Weig
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Addition of femoral 3-in-1 blockade to intra-articular ropivacaine 0.2% does not reduce analgesic requirements following arthroscopic knee surgery.

Authors:  S K Schwarz; L G Franciosi; C R Ries; W D Regan; R G Davidson; K Nevin; S Escobedo; B A MacLeod
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Postoperative analgesic requirements in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  C L Wu; R D Bronstein; J M Chen; D H Lee; L M Rouse
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2000-12

5.  Femoral nerve block and ketorolac in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  P Peng; A Claxton; F Chung; V Chan; A Miniaci; A Krishnathas
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Postoperative analgesia after knee surgery: a comparison of three different concentrations of ropivacaine for continuous femoral nerve blockade.

Authors:  Gerhard Brodner; Hartmut Buerkle; Hugo Van Aken; Roushan Lambert; Marie-Luise Schweppe-Hartenauer; Carola Wempe; Wiebke Gogarten
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 7.  Epidural analgesia compared with peripheral nerve blockade after major knee surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  S J Fowler; J Symons; S Sabato; P S Myles
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Comparison of epidural, continuous femoral block and intraarticular analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  M Dauri; M Polzoni; E Fabbi; T Sidiropoulou; S Servetti; F Coniglione; P Mariani; A F Sabato
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.105

9.  BTB ACL reconstruction: femoral nerve block has no advantage over intraarticular local anaesthetic infiltration.

Authors:  S A Mehdi; D J N Dalton; V Sivarajan; W J Leach
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Femoral block provides superior analgesia compared with intra-articular ropivacaine after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Henri Iskandar; Antoine Benard; Joelle Ruel-Raymond; Gyslaine Cochard; Bertrand Manaud
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.288

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Multidisciplinary assessment for multimodal pain therapy. Indications and range of performance].

Authors:  H-R Casser; B Arnold; T Brinkschmidt; I Gralow; D Irnich; K Klimczyk; B Nagel; M Pfingsten; M Schiltenwolf; R Sittl; W Söllner
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.107

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.