Literature DB >> 10451133

Addition of femoral 3-in-1 blockade to intra-articular ropivacaine 0.2% does not reduce analgesic requirements following arthroscopic knee surgery.

S K Schwarz1, L G Franciosi, C R Ries, W D Regan, R G Davidson, K Nevin, S Escobedo, B A MacLeod.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that the addition of a preincisional femoral 3-in-1 block to intra-articular instillation with ropivacaine 0.2% at the end of surgery improves postoperative pain control in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) under general anesthesia.
METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, we studied 44 patients scheduled for inpatient ACLR. Prior to incision, the treatment group (n = 22) received a femoral 3-in-1 block with 40 ml ropivacaine 0.2%, augmented by infiltrations of the lateral and anteromedial incisions with 20 ml ropivacaine 0.2% at the end of the procedure. The control group (n = 22) received saline 0.9% instead of ropivacaine. All patients received an intra-articular instillation with 30 ml ropivacaine 0.2% at the end of surgery. The primary efficacy variable was 24 hr morphine consumption postoperatively standardized by weight, administered intravenously via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump.
RESULTS: There was no difference between both groups in 24 hr PCA morphine consumption postoperatively (control, 0.45 +/- 0.44 [mean +/- SD] mg x kg(-1); treatment, 0.37 +/- 0.50 mg x kg(-1); p = 0.55). No difference was found in postoperative visual analog scale pain scores, adverse events, or vital signs. In the treatment group, R = 10/22 patients did not require postoperative morphine compared with R = 6/22 in the control group (P = 0.35).
CONCLUSION: We found no effect of a femoral 3-in-1 block with ropivacaine 0.2% on postoperative analgesic consumption, compared to intra-articular instillation with ropivacaine 0.2% alone, in patients undergoing ACLR under general anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10451133     DOI: 10.1007/BF03013909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  4 in total

Review 1.  Drug interactions with patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  Jorn Lotsch; Carsten Skarke; Irmgard Tegeder; Gerd Geisslinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  [Levobupivacaine vs. ropivacaine for continuous femoral analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  M Schuster; L Engelhardt; W Erler; B Dienert; M Wagner; J Birnbaum; T Volk
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Local infiltration analgesia is comparable to femoral nerve block after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pia Kjær Kristensen; Mogens Pfeiffer-Jensen; Jens Ole Storm; Theis Muncholm Thillemann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  BTB ACL reconstruction: femoral nerve block has no advantage over intraarticular local anaesthetic infiltration.

Authors:  S A Mehdi; D J N Dalton; V Sivarajan; W J Leach
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.