Literature DB >> 17578984

Postoperative analgesia after knee surgery: a comparison of three different concentrations of ropivacaine for continuous femoral nerve blockade.

Gerhard Brodner1, Hartmut Buerkle, Hugo Van Aken, Roushan Lambert, Marie-Luise Schweppe-Hartenauer, Carola Wempe, Wiebke Gogarten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The most effective ropivacaine concentration for femoral infusion after total knee arthroplasty is currently ill defined. We designed the present study to compare ropivacaine in three different concentrations (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3%) to evaluate analgesic quality, when administered as a continuous infusion with frequent infusion adjustments in patients receiving a combined femoral and sciatic nerve block. Secondary aims were to evaluate side effects such as motor blockade, rehabilitation indices, and ropivacaine plasma concentrations.
METHODS: One hundred twenty-two patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty under combined general and regional anesthesia received femoral infusions of ropivacaine 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3%. Infusions were started after initial loading doses of 30 mL ropivacaine 0.5% into the femoral catheter and a sciatic catheter and were targeted to dynamic pain scores of 40 mm. Pain and side effects were assessed 1 h after tracheal extubation and on the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth postoperative days. Ropivacaine plasma concentrations were measured 24, 48, and 72 h after the start and 24 h after termination of femoral infusions in patients receiving ropivacaine 0.2% or 0.3%.
RESULTS: Ropivacaine 0.1% provided ineffective analgesia. Ropivacaine 0.2% and 0.3% provided equivalent analgesia. Maximum infusion rates were 15.39 and 13.77 mL/h for ropivacaine 0.2% and 0.3%, respectively. There were no significant differences in motor blockade, mobilization, or ropivacaine plasma concentrations, which remained below toxic levels throughout the study period.
CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine 0.2% and 0.3% were similar in terms of analgesic quality. Initial infusion rates should be adjusted to 15 mL/h to obtain effective analgesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17578984     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000265552.43299.2b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  21 in total

1.  Continuous femoral nerve blocks: decreasing local anesthetic concentration to minimize quadriceps femoris weakness.

Authors:  Maria Bauer; Lu Wang; Olusegun K Onibonoje; Chad Parrett; Daniel I Sessler; Loran Mounir-Soliman; Sherif Zaky; Viktor Krebs; Leonard T Buller; Michael C Donohue; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley; Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Letter to the editor: Single-injection or continuous femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Kelly Byrne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Reply to the Letter to the editor: Single-injection or continuous femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Eric Albrecht; Dorothea Morfey; Richard Brull
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Continuous femoral nerve blocks: the impact of catheter tip location relative to the femoral nerve (anterior versus posterior) on quadriceps weakness and cutaneous sensory block.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Vanessa J Loland; NavParkash S Sandhu; Preetham J Suresh; Michael J Bishop; Michael C Donohue; Eliza J Ferguson; Sarah J Madison
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  [Levobupivacaine vs. ropivacaine for continuous femoral analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  M Schuster; L Engelhardt; W Erler; B Dienert; M Wagner; J Birnbaum; T Volk
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  Continuous femoral nerve blocks: varying local anesthetic delivery method (bolus versus basal) to minimize quadriceps motor block while maintaining sensory block.

Authors:  Matthew T Charous; Sarah J Madison; Preetham J Suresh; NavParkash S Sandhu; Vanessa J Loland; Edward R Mariano; Michael C Donohue; Pascual H Dutton; Eliza J Ferguson; Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Ambulatory continuous femoral nerve blocks decrease time to discharge readiness after tricompartment total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Linda T Le; R Scott Meyer; Edward R Mariano; Krista Vandenborne; Pamela W Duncan; Daniel I Sessler; F Kayser Enneking; Jonathan J Shuster; Douglas W Theriaque; Linda F Berry; Eugene H Spadoni; Peter F Gearen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Single-injection or continuous femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Eric Albrecht; Dorothea Morfey; Vincent Chan; Rajiv Gandhi; Arkadiy Koshkin; Ki Jinn Chin; Sylvie Robinson; Philippe Frascarolo; Richard Brull
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The effects of varying local anesthetic concentration and volume on continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blocks: a dual-center, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Vanessa J Loland; J C Gerancher; Anupama N Wadhwa; Elizabeth M Renehan; Daniel I Sessler; Jonathan J Shuster; Douglas W Theriaque; Rosalita C Maldonado; Edward R Mariano
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Effect of pre-incisional continuous regional block on early and late postoperative conditions in tibial osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C Motamed; X Combes; S-K Ndoko; G Dhonneur
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2009-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.