PURPOSE: To evaluate a deformable image registration (DIR) segmentation technique for semi-automating ITV production from 4DCT for lung patients, in terms of accuracy and efficiency. METHODS: Twenty-five stereotactic body radiotherapy lung patients were selected in this retrospective study. ITVs were manually delineated by an oncologist and semi-automatically produced by propagating the GTV manually delineated on the mid-ventilation phase to all other phases using two different DIR algorithms, using commercial software. The two ITVs produced by DIR were compared to the manually delineated ITV using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance between agreement and normalised DSC. DIR-produced ITVs were assessed for their clinical suitability and also the time savings were estimated. RESULTS: Eighteen out of 25 ITVs had normalised DSC>1 indicating an agreement with the manually produced ITV within 1mm uncertainty. Four of the other seven ITVs were deemed clinically acceptable and three would require a small amount of editing. In general, ITVs produced by DIR were smoother than those produced by manual delineation. It was estimated that using this technique would save clinicians on average 28 min/patient. CONCLUSIONS: ABAS was found to be a useful tool in the production of ITVs for lung patients. The ITVs produced are either immediately clinically acceptable or require minimal editing. This approach represents a significant time saving for clinicians.
PURPOSE: To evaluate a deformable image registration (DIR) segmentation technique for semi-automating ITV production from 4DCT for lung patients, in terms of accuracy and efficiency. METHODS: Twenty-five stereotactic body radiotherapy lung patients were selected in this retrospective study. ITVs were manually delineated by an oncologist and semi-automatically produced by propagating the GTV manually delineated on the mid-ventilation phase to all other phases using two different DIR algorithms, using commercial software. The two ITVs produced by DIR were compared to the manually delineated ITV using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance between agreement and normalised DSC. DIR-produced ITVs were assessed for their clinical suitability and also the time savings were estimated. RESULTS: Eighteen out of 25 ITVs had normalised DSC>1 indicating an agreement with the manually produced ITV within 1mm uncertainty. Four of the other seven ITVs were deemed clinically acceptable and three would require a small amount of editing. In general, ITVs produced by DIR were smoother than those produced by manual delineation. It was estimated that using this technique would save clinicians on average 28 min/patient. CONCLUSIONS: ABAS was found to be a useful tool in the production of ITVs for lung patients. The ITVs produced are either immediately clinically acceptable or require minimal editing. This approach represents a significant time saving for clinicians.
Authors: Frederick M Lartey; Marjan Rafat; Mohammadreza Negahdar; Andrey V Malkovskiy; Xinzhe Dong; Xiaoli Sun; Mei Li; Timothy Doyle; Jayakumar Rajadas; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo; Peter G Maxim Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Michael Velec; Joanne L Moseley; Stina Svensson; Björn Hårdemark; David A Jaffray; Kristy K Brock Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: C G Vos; M Dahele; J R van Sörnsen de Koste; S Senan; I Bahce; M A Paul; E Thunnissen; E F Smit; K J Hartemink Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-12-22 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Salim Balik; Elisabeth Weiss; Nuzhat Jan; Nicholas Roman; William C Sleeman; Mirek Fatyga; Gary E Christensen; Cheng Zhang; Martin J Murphy; Jun Lu; Paul Keall; Jeffrey F Williamson; Geoffrey D Hugo Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Nicholas Hardcastle; Wouter van Elmpt; Dirk De Ruysscher; Karl Bzdusek; Wolfgang A Tomé Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 3.481