Literature DB >> 21257120

Preliminary healthy eating outcomes of SNaX, a pilot community-based intervention for adolescents.

Laura M Bogart1, Marc N Elliott, Kimberly Uyeda, Jennifer Hawes-Dawson, David J Klein, Mark A Schuster.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We used principles of community-based participatory research to develop and pilot test a 5-week intervention for middle school students, Students for Nutrition and eXercise (SNaX). SNaX aimed to translate school obesity-prevention policies into practice with peer advocacy of healthy eating and school cafeteria changes.
METHODS: A total 425 seventh graders (63% of all seventh graders) in the intervention school were surveyed at baseline regarding cafeteria attitudes and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption; of the 425 students, 399 (94%) were surveyed again at 1-month post-intervention. School cafeteria records were obtained from two schools: the intervention school and a nonrandomized selected comparison school with similar student socio-demographic characteristics.
RESULTS: A total of 140 students in the intervention school were trained as peer advocates. In the intervention school, cafeteria attitudes among peer advocates significantly improved over time (approximately one-third of a standard deviation), whereas cafeteria attitudes of non-peer advocates remained stable; the improvement among peer advocates was significantly greater than the pre-post-change for non-peer advocates (b = .71, p < .001). Peer advocates significantly reduced their sugar-sweetened beverage intake (sports and fruit drinks), from 33% before intervention to 21% after intervention (p = .03). Cafeteria records indicated that servings of fruit and healthier entrées (salads, sandwiches, and yogurt parfaits) significantly decreased in the comparison school and significantly increased in the intervention school; the magnitude of changes differed significantly between the schools (p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: As compared with the non-peer advocates, peer advocates appeared to benefit more from the intervention. Future research should consider engaging parents, students, and other key community stakeholders to determine acceptable and sustainable cafeteria changes.
Copyright © 2011 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21257120      PMCID: PMC3050639          DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  28 in total

1.  Changes in dietary intake account for seasonal changes in cardiovascular disease risk factors.

Authors:  D R Shahar; P Froom; G Harari; N Yerushalmi; F Lubin; E Kristal-Boneh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Seasonal variations in dietary intake affect the consistency of dietary assessment.

Authors:  D R Shahar; N Yerushalmi; F Lubin; P Froom; A Shahar; E Kristal-Boneh
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 3.  Classification of race and ethnicity: implications for public health.

Authors:  Vickie M Mays; Ninez A Ponce; Donna L Washington; Susan D Cochran
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2002-10-23       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools.

Authors:  Thomas W Valente; Beth R Hoffman; Annamara Ritt-Olson; Kara Lichtman; C Anderson Johnson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Are differences in exposure to a multicomponent school-based intervention associated with varying dietary outcomes in adolescents?

Authors:  Amanda S Birnbaum; Leslie A Lytle; Mary Story; Cheryl L Perry; David M Murray
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2002-08

6.  An environmental intervention to promote lower-fat food choices in secondary schools: outcomes of the TACOS Study.

Authors:  Simone A French; Mary Story; Jayne A Fulkerson; Peter Hannan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  School-based approaches to affect adolescents' diets: results from the TEENS study.

Authors:  Leslie A Lytle; David M Murray; Cheryl L Perry; Mary Story; Amanda S Birnbaum; Martha Y Kubik; Sherri Varnell
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2004-04

8.  Comparison of social variables for understanding physical activity in adolescent girls.

Authors:  Ruth P Saunders; Robert W Motl; Marsha Dowda; Rod K Dishman; Russell R Pate
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

9.  Understanding soft drink consumption among male adolescents using the theory of planned behavior.

Authors:  Nada O Kassem; Jerry W Lee
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-06

10.  Early sexual initiation: the role of peer norms.

Authors:  S B Kinsman; D Romer; F F Furstenberg; D F Schwarz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Peer-led nutrition education programs for school-aged youth: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Calvin Yip; Michelle Gates; Allison Gates; Rhona M Hanning
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2015-12-10

2.  Kids SIP smartER: A Feasibility Study to Reduce Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Among Middle School Youth in Central Appalachia.

Authors:  Hannah Lane; Kathleen J Porter; Erin Hecht; Priscilla Harris; Vivica Kraak; Jamie Zoellner
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2017-07-21

3.  A randomized controlled trial of students for nutrition and eXercise: a community-based participatory research study.

Authors:  Laura M Bogart; Burton O Cowgill; Marc N Elliott; David J Klein; Jennifer Hawes-Dawson; Kimberly Uyeda; Jacinta Elijah; David G Binkle; Mark A Schuster
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  Perceptions and Impact of a Youth-led Childhood Obesity Prevention Intervention among Youth-leaders.

Authors:  Elizabeth Anderson Steeves; Angela Cristina Bizzotto Trude; Cara Frances Ruggiero; Maria Jose Mejia Ruiz; Jessica C Jones-Smith; Keshia Pollack Porter; Lawrence Cheskin; Kristen Hurley; Laura Hopkins; Joel Gittelsohn
Journal:  J Hunger Environ Nutr       Date:  2019-08-05

5.  Health and academic achievement: cumulative effects of health assets on standardized test scores among urban youth in the United States.

Authors:  Jeannette R Ickovics; Amy Carroll-Scott; Susan M Peters; Marlene Schwartz; Kathryn Gilstad-Hayden; Catherine McCaslin
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.118

Review 6.  A Systematic Review to Assess Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Interventions for Children and Adolescents across the Socioecological Model.

Authors:  Hannah Lane; Kathleen Porter; Paul Estabrooks; Jamie Zoellner
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.910

7.  A Youth-Leader Program in Baltimore City Recreation Centers: Lessons Learned and Applications.

Authors:  Angela C B Trude; Elizabeth Anderson Steeves; Cara Shipley; Pamela J Surkan; Priscila de Morais Sato; Tracey Estep; Stella Clanton; Lisa Lachenmayr; Joel Gittelsohn
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2017-09-12

Review 8.  A Systematic Review of Digital Interventions for Improving the Diet and Physical Activity Behaviors of Adolescents.

Authors:  Taylor Rose; Mary Barker; Chandni Maria Jacob; Leanne Morrison; Wendy Lawrence; Sofia Strömmer; Christina Vogel; Kathryn Woods-Townsend; David Farrell; Hazel Inskip; Janis Baird
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.012

9.  Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health.

Authors:  Peter von Philipsborn; Jan M Stratil; Jacob Burns; Laura K Busert; Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Stephanie Polus; Christina Holzapfel; Hans Hauner; Eva Rehfuess
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-06-12

Review 10.  Child and youth participatory interventions for addressing lifestyle-related childhood obesity: a systematic review.

Authors:  L Frerichs; O Ataga; G Corbie-Smith; S Tessler Lindau
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 9.213

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.