Literature DB >> 25116906

Warranty periods for normal myocardial perfusion stress SPECT.

Guillermo Romero-Farina1, Jaume Candell-Riera, Santiago Aguadé-Bruix, Ignacio Ferreira-González, Gemma Cuberas-Borrós, Nazarena Pizzi, David García-Dorado.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess different warranty periods following a normal myocardial perfusion SPECT based on patients' clinical characteristics and the type of stress performed. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A study was done of 2,922 consecutive patients (62.9 ± 13 years; 53.4% women) with a normal stress-rest SPECT. The warranty period was defined as the period during which patients remained at a low risk (<1% events/year) of total mortality (TM), or hard events (HE) (cardiac death or non-fatal myocardial infarction). Of these patients, 2,051 were given an exercise myocardial perfusion imaging (Ex-MPI); 461 submaximal exercise plus dipyridamole (Ex+Dipy-MPI); and 410 dipyridamole (Dipy-MPI). During a mean follow-up of 5 ± 3.3 years, a significant reduction (P < .05) of the warranty period for TM (13.5, 9.6 and 8 months) and HE (34.8, 20.5 and 8.2 months) was observed, for Ex-MPI, Ex+Dipy-MPI and Dipy-MPI, respectively. Other warranty period determinants were the clinical variables of age, sex, diabetes and known coronary artery disease. An abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction on gated-SPECT also significantly shortened the warranty period for HE in patients undergoing Ex+Dipy-MPI (P = .001) or Dipy-MPI alone (P = .007).
CONCLUSIONS: The warranty period for a normal stress-rest SPECT is highly variable since it is primarily determined by the type of stress, the patient's clinical characteristics and LVEF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25116906     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-014-9957-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  28 in total

1.  Determinants of risk and its temporal variation in patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion scans: what is the warranty period of a normal scan?

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Sean Hayes; John D Friedman; Ishac Cohen; Leslee J Shaw; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Patients with adenosine-induced ST-segment depressions and normal myocardial perfusion imaging: cardiac outcomes at 24 months.

Authors:  Jyoti Sharma; Christine Roncari; Kenneth N Giedd; John T Fox; Yumiko Kanei
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Daniel S Berman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Paul A Heidenreich; Robert E Henkin; Patricia A Pellikka; Gerald M Pohost; Kim A Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Simultaneous dipyridamole/maximal subjective exercise with 99mTc-MIBI SPECT: improved diagnostic yield in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J Candell-Riera; C Santana-Boado; J Castell-Conesa; S Aguadé-Bruix; M Olona; J Palet; J Cortadellas; A García-Burillo; J Soler-Soler
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Prognosis in patients with suspected or known ischemic heart disease and normal myocardial perfusion: long-term outcome and temporal risk variations.

Authors:  Jane A Simonsen; Oke Gerke; Charlotte K Rask; Mohammad Tamadoni; Anders Thomassen; Søren Hess; Allan Johansen; Hans Mickley; Lisette O Jensen; Jesper Hallas; Werner Vach; Poul F Høilund-Carlsen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Prognostic value of normal exercise and adenosine (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT imaging: results from the multicenter registry of 4,728 patients.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Robert Hendel; Salvador Borges-Neto; Michael S Lauer; Naomi Alazraki; Joy Burnette; Elizabeth Krawczynska; Manuel Cerqueira; Jamshid Maddahi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  12-Year outcome after normal myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with known coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Machiel J M Ottenhof; Marisa C G Tjong Joe Wai; Hendrik J Boiten; Rebecca S Korbee; Roelf Valkema; Ron T van Domburg; Arend F L Schinkel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Prognostic significance of ischemic electrocardiographic changes during vasodilator stress testing in patients with normal SPECT images.

Authors:  Elizabeth Klodas; Todd D Miller; Timothy F Christian; David O Hodge; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Long-term mortality following normal exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT according to coronary disease risk factors.

Authors:  Alan Rozanski; Heidi Gransar; James K Min; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Louise E J Thomson; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 5.952

View more
  7 in total

1.  Looking at the whole picture.

Authors:  Michael J Zellweger
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Is downstream cardiac testing required in patients with reduced functional capacity and otherwise negative exercise stress test? A single center observational study.

Authors:  Mark Whitman; Surendran Sabapathy; Carly Jenkins; Lewis Adams
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  Does a test impact on a patient's life many years from now?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Debates over NICE Guideline Update: What Are the Roles of Nuclear Cardiology in the Initial Evaluation of Stable Chest Pain?

Authors:  Sang-Geon Cho; Jahae Kim; Ho-Chun Song
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-08-28

5.  Transient ischaemic dilation and post-stress wall motion abnormality increase risk in patients with less than moderate ischaemia: analysis of the REFINE SPECT registry.

Authors:  Robert J H Miller; Lien-Hsin Hu; Heidi Gransar; Julian Betancur; Evann Eisenberg; Yuka Otaki; Tali Sharir; Mathews B Fish; Terrence D Ruddy; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo Di Carli; Andrew J Einstein; Philipp A Kaufmann; Albert J Sinusas; Edward J Miller; Timothy Bateman; Guido Germano; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 6.  The role of pharmacological stress testing in women.

Authors:  Katherine Standbridge; Eliana Reyes
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Myocardial Perfusion in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Associations with Traditional Risk Factors and Novel Biomarkers.

Authors:  Miguel Bernardes; Tiago S Vieira; Maria João Martins; Raquel Lucas; Lúcia Costa; Jorge G Pereira; Francisco Ventura; Elisabete Martins
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.