Literature DB >> 21256434

Sexual selection.

David J Hosken1, Clarissa M House.   

Abstract

Sexual selection is a concept that has probably been misunderstood and misrepresented more than any other idea in evolutionary biology, confusion that continues to the present day. We are not entirely sure why this is, but sexual politics seems to have played its role, as does a failure to understand what sexual selection is and why it was initially invoked. While in some ways less intuitive than natural selection, sexual selection is conceptually identical to it, and evolution via either mechanism will occur given sufficient genetic variation. Recent claims that sexual selection theory is fundamentally flawed are simply wrong and ignore an enormous body of evidence that provides a bedrock of support for this major mechanism of organic evolution. In fact it is partly due to this solid foundation that current research has largely shifted from documenting whether or not sexual selection occurs, to addressing more complex evolutionary questions. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21256434     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  23 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition.

Authors:  Joseph A Tobias; Robert Montgomerie; Bruce E Lyon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Sexual selection is a form of social selection.

Authors:  Bruce E Lyon; Robert Montgomerie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Partitioning sexual selection into its mating success and fertilization success components.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; William R Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sexual selection drives the evolution of male wing interference patterns.

Authors:  M F Hawkes; E Duffy; R Joag; A Skeats; J Radwan; N Wedell; M D Sharma; D J Hosken; J Troscianko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Grey zones of sexual selection: why is finding a modern definition so hard?

Authors:  Suzanne H Alonzo; Maria R Servedio
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  On the evolution of visual female sexual signalling.

Authors:  Kelly Rooker; Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Sexual conflict over mating in Gnatocerus cornutus? Females prefer lovers not fighters.

Authors:  Kensuke Okada; Masako Katsuki; Manmohan D Sharma; Clarissa M House; David J Hosken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Intralocus sexual conflict and insecticide resistance.

Authors:  M F Hawkes; C E Gamble; E C R Turner; M R Carey; N Wedell; D J Hosken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Mate Choice and the Persistence of Maternal Mortality.

Authors:  Santosh Jagadeeshan; Alyssa K Gomes; Rama S Singh
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.060

10.  Natural selection increases female fitness by reversing the exaggeration of a male sexually selected trait.

Authors:  Kensuke Okada; Masako Katsuki; Manmohan D Sharma; Katsuya Kiyose; Tomokazu Seko; Yasukazu Okada; Alastair J Wilson; David J Hosken
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.