BACKGROUND/AIMS: The levels of pepsinogen (PG) I and the PGI/II ratio are useful serologic markers for chronic atrophic gastritis. This study evaluated the performance and clinical implications of these markers in patients undergoing endoscopic mucosectomy. METHODS: We enrolled 142 consecutive patients with early gastric tumors and Helicobacter pylori infection who were eligible for mucosectomy. Chronic gastritis and atrophy were assessed using four defined biopsy procedures. Serum PGs were measured by an enzyme immunoassay. Optimal diagnostic cut-offs and performance were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The PGI level and the PGI/II ratio decreased with corpus-dominant gastritis and as atrophy advanced toward the corpus greater curvature (GC). For the presence of corpus GC atrophy, the areas under the PGI and PGI/II-ratio curves were 0.82 and 0.77, respectively. The optimal cut-off levels were 59.3µg/L for PGI (sensitivity, 83.3%; specificity, 78.4%) and 3.6µg/L for PGI/II ratio (sensitivity, 70.0%; specificity, 78.4%). Using these serologic cut-off levels, we found that the frequency of corpus tumor location differed significantly (32.9% vs 11.1% for PGI <59.3 and ≥59.3µg/L, respectively; and 31.1% vs 14.8% for PGI/II ratio <3.5 and ≥3.5, respectively; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A low PGI level and PGI/II ratio are valuable serologic markers for predicting corpus GC atrophy, and have clinical implications with respect to the corpus location of tumors in mucosectomy patients.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The levels of pepsinogen (PG) I and the PGI/II ratio are useful serologic markers for chronic atrophic gastritis. This study evaluated the performance and clinical implications of these markers in patients undergoing endoscopic mucosectomy. METHODS: We enrolled 142 consecutive patients with early gastric tumors and Helicobacter pylori infection who were eligible for mucosectomy. Chronic gastritis and atrophy were assessed using four defined biopsy procedures. Serum PGs were measured by an enzyme immunoassay. Optimal diagnostic cut-offs and performance were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The PGI level and the PGI/II ratio decreased with corpus-dominant gastritis and as atrophy advanced toward the corpus greater curvature (GC). For the presence of corpus GC atrophy, the areas under the PGI and PGI/II-ratio curves were 0.82 and 0.77, respectively. The optimal cut-off levels were 59.3µg/L for PGI (sensitivity, 83.3%; specificity, 78.4%) and 3.6µg/L for PGI/II ratio (sensitivity, 70.0%; specificity, 78.4%). Using these serologic cut-off levels, we found that the frequency of corpus tumor location differed significantly (32.9% vs 11.1% for PGI <59.3 and ≥59.3µg/L, respectively; and 31.1% vs 14.8% for PGI/II ratio <3.5 and ≥3.5, respectively; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A low PGI level and PGI/II ratio are valuable serologic markers for predicting corpus GC atrophy, and have clinical implications with respect to the corpus location of tumors in mucosectomy patients.
Authors: D I Park; P L Rhee; J E Kim; J G Hyun; Y H Kim; H J Son; J J Kim; S W Paik; J C Rhee; K W Choi; Y L Oh Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: N Uemura; S Okamoto; S Yamamoto; N Matsumura; S Yamaguchi; M Yamakido; K Taniyama; N Sasaki; R J Schlemper Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-09-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: K Varis; P Sipponen; F Laxén; I M Samloff; J K Huttunen; P R Taylor; O P Heinonen; D Albanes; N Sande; J Virtamo; M Härkönen Journal: Scand J Gastroenterol Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 2.423
Authors: M Rugge; P Correa; M F Dixon; R Fiocca; T Hattori; J Lechago; G Leandro; A B Price; P Sipponen; E Solcia; H Watanabe; R M Genta Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Maomao Cao; He Li; Dianqin Sun; Lin Lei; Jiansong Ren; Jufang Shi; Ni Li; Ji Peng; Wanqing Chen Journal: Chin J Cancer Res Date: 2020-10-31 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Dariush Nasrollahzadeh; Karim Aghcheli; Masoud Sotoudeh; Ramin Shakeri; E Christina Persson; Farhad Islami; Farin Kamangar; Christian C Abnet; Paolo Boffetta; Lars Engstrand; Sanford M Dawsey; Reza Malekzadeh; Weimin Ye Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-10-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sang Pyo Lee; Sun Young Lee; Jeong Hwan Kim; In Kyung Sung; Hyung Seok Park; Chan Sup Shim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 2.153