Literature DB >> 21252201

Large duplications at reciprocal translocation breakpoints that might be the counterpart of large deletions and could arise from stalled replication bubbles.

Karen D Howarth1, Jessica C M Pole, Juliet C Beavis, Elizabeth M Batty, Scott Newman, Graham R Bignell, Paul A W Edwards.   

Abstract

Reciprocal chromosome translocations are often not exactly reciprocal. Most familiar are deletions at the breakpoints, up to megabases in extent. We describe here the opposite phenomenon-duplication of tens or hundreds of kilobases at the breakpoint junction, so that the same sequence is present on both products of a translocation. When the products of the translocation are mapped on the genome, they overlap. We report several of these "overlapping-breakpoint" duplications in breast cancer cell lines HCC1187, HCC1806, and DU4475. These lines also had deletions and essentially balanced translocations. In HCC1187 and HCC1806, we identified five cases of duplication ranging between 46 kb and 200 kb, with the partner chromosome showing deletions between 29 bp and 31 Mb. DU4475 had a duplication of at least 200 kb. Breakpoints were mapped using array painting, i.e., hybridization of chromosomes isolated by flow cytometry to custom oligonucleotide microarrays. Duplications were verified by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), PCR on isolated chromosomes, and cloning of breakpoints. We propose that these duplications are the counterpart of deletions and that they are produced at a replication bubble, comprising two replication forks with the duplicated sequence in between. Both copies of the duplicated sequence would go to one daughter cell, on different products of the translocation, while the other daughter cell would show deletion. These duplications may have been overlooked because they may be missed by FISH and array-CGH and may be interpreted as insertions by paired-end sequencing. Such duplications may therefore be quite frequent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21252201      PMCID: PMC3065700          DOI: 10.1101/gr.114116.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  35 in total

1.  Array painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes using DNA microarrays.

Authors:  H Fiegler; S M Gribble; D C Burford; P Carr; E Prigmore; K M Porter; S Clegg; J A Crolla; N R Dennis; P Jacobs; N P Carter
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  The complex nature of constitutional de novo apparently balanced translocations in patients presenting with abnormal phenotypes.

Authors:  S M Gribble; E Prigmore; D C Burford; K M Porter; Bee Ling Ng; E J Douglas; H Fiegler; P Carr; D Kalaitzopoulos; S Clegg; R Sandstrom; I K Temple; S A Youings; N S Thomas; N R Dennis; P A Jacobs; J A Crolla; N P Carter
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Unexpected complexity at breakpoint junctions in phenotypically normal individuals and mechanisms involved in generating balanced translocations t(1;22)(p36;q13).

Authors:  Marzena Gajecka; Andrew J Gentles; Albert Tsai; David Chitayat; Katherine L Mackay; Caron D Glotzbach; Michael R Lieber; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Signatures of mutation and selection in the cancer genome.

Authors:  Graham R Bignell; Chris D Greenman; Helen Davies; Adam P Butler; Sarah Edkins; Jenny M Andrews; Gemma Buck; Lina Chen; David Beare; Calli Latimer; Sara Widaa; Jonathon Hinton; Ciara Fahey; Beiyuan Fu; Sajani Swamy; Gillian L Dalgliesh; Bin T Teh; Panos Deloukas; Fengtang Yang; Peter J Campbell; P Andrew Futreal; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  t(11;18)(q21;q21) of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma results from illegitimate non-homologous end joining following double strand breaks.

Authors:  Hongxiang Liu; Rifat A Hamoudi; Hongtao Ye; Agnes Ruskone-Fourmestraux; Ahmet Dogan; Peter G Isaacson; Ming-Qing Du
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.998

6.  Characterization of paired tumor and non-tumor cell lines established from patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  A F Gazdar; V Kurvari; A Virmani; L Gollahon; M Sakaguchi; M Westerfield; D Kodagoda; V Stasny; H T Cunningham; I I Wistuba; G Tomlinson; V Tonk; R Ashfaq; A M Leitch; J D Minna; J W Shay
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1998-12-09       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Consistent disruption of the AML1 gene occurs within a single intron in the t(8;21) chromosomal translocation.

Authors:  K Shimizu; H Miyoshi; T Kozu; J Nagata; K Enomoto; N Maseki; Y Kaneko; M Ohki
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  One short well conserved region of Alu-sequences is involved in human gene rearrangements and has homology with prokaryotic chi.

Authors:  N S Rüdiger; N Gregersen; M C Kielland-Brandt
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  High-resolution analysis of chromosome rearrangements on 8p in breast, colon and pancreatic cancer reveals a complex pattern of loss, gain and translocation.

Authors:  J C M Pole; C Courtay-Cahen; M J Garcia; K A Blood; S L Cooke; A E Alsop; D M L Tse; C Caldas; P A W Edwards
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Tandem duplication producing a novel oncogenic BRAF fusion gene defines the majority of pilocytic astrocytomas.

Authors:  David T W Jones; Sylvia Kocialkowski; Lu Liu; Danita M Pearson; L Magnus Bäcklund; Koichi Ichimura; V Peter Collins
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  21 in total

1.  Balanced into array: genome-wide array analysis in 54 patients with an apparently balanced de novo chromosome rearrangement and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilse Feenstra; Nicolien Hanemaaijer; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Helger Yntema; Trijnie Dijkhuizen; Dorien Lugtenberg; Joke Verheij; Andrew Green; Roel Hordijk; William Reardon; Bert de Vries; Han Brunner; Ernie Bongers; Nicole de Leeuw; Conny van Ravenswaaij-Arts
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Mechanisms of gene duplication and amplification.

Authors:  Andrew B Reams; John R Roth
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Genome sequencing of pediatric medulloblastoma links catastrophic DNA rearrangements with TP53 mutations.

Authors:  Tobias Rausch; David T W Jones; Marc Zapatka; Adrian M Stütz; Thomas Zichner; Joachim Weischenfeldt; Natalie Jäger; Marc Remke; David Shih; Paul A Northcott; Elke Pfaff; Jelena Tica; Qi Wang; Luca Massimi; Hendrik Witt; Sebastian Bender; Sabrina Pleier; Huriye Cin; Cynthia Hawkins; Christian Beck; Andreas von Deimling; Volkmar Hans; Benedikt Brors; Roland Eils; Wolfram Scheurlen; Jonathon Blake; Vladimir Benes; Andreas E Kulozik; Olaf Witt; Dianna Martin; Cindy Zhang; Rinnat Porat; Diana M Merino; Jonathan Wasserman; Nada Jabado; Adam Fontebasso; Lars Bullinger; Frank G Rücker; Konstanze Döhner; Hartmut Döhner; Jan Koster; Jan J Molenaar; Rogier Versteeg; Marcel Kool; Uri Tabori; David Malkin; Andrey Korshunov; Michael D Taylor; Peter Lichter; Stefan M Pfister; Jan O Korbel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  PREVENTING THE CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATIONS THAT CAUSE CANCER.

Authors:  Robert Hromas; Elizabeth Williamson; Suk-Hee Lee; Jac Nickoloff
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2016

Review 5.  Chromothripsis: chromosomes in crisis.

Authors:  Mathew J K Jones; Prasad V Jallepalli
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 12.270

6.  Noninvasive detection of fetal subchromosome abnormalities via deep sequencing of maternal plasma.

Authors:  Anupama Srinivasan; Diana W Bianchi; Hui Huang; Amy J Sehnert; Richard P Rava
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Structural analysis of the genome of breast cancer cell line ZR-75-30 identifies twelve expressed fusion genes.

Authors:  Ina Schulte; Elizabeth M Batty; Jessica C M Pole; Katherine A Blood; Steven Mo; Susanna L Cooke; Charlotte Ng; Kevin L Howe; Suet-Feung Chin; James D Brenton; Carlos Caldas; Karen D Howarth; Paul A W Edwards
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Genome-wide sequencing for the identification of rearrangements associated with Tourette syndrome and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Sean D Hooper; Anna C V Johansson; Christian Tellgren-Roth; Eva-Lena Stattin; Niklas Dahl; Lucia Cavelier; Lars Feuk
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 2.103

9.  Bellerophon: a hybrid method for detecting interchromosomal rearrangements at base pair resolution using next-generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Matthew Hayes; Jing Li
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The relative timing of mutations in a breast cancer genome.

Authors:  Scott Newman; Karen D Howarth; Chris D Greenman; Graham R Bignell; Simon Tavaré; Paul A W Edwards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.