Literature DB >> 21244185

Transitivity of preferences.

Michel Regenwetter1, Jason Dana, Clintin P Davis-Stober.   

Abstract

Transitivity of preferences is a fundamental principle shared by most major contemporary rational, prescriptive, and descriptive models of decision making. To have transitive preferences, a person, group, or society that prefers choice option x to y and y to z must prefer x to z. Any claim of empirical violations of transitivity by individual decision makers requires evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. We discuss why unambiguous evidence is currently lacking and how to clarify the issue. In counterpoint to Tversky's (1969) seminal "Intransitivity of Preferences," we reconsider his data as well as those from more than 20 other studies of intransitive human or animal decision makers. We challenge the standard operationalizations of transitive preferences and discuss pervasive methodological problems in the collection, modeling, and analysis of relevant empirical data. For example, violations of weak stochastic transitivity do not imply violations of transitivity of preference. Building on past multidisciplinary work, we use parsimonious mixture models, where the space of permissible preference states is the family of (transitive) strict linear orders. We show that the data from many of the available studies designed to elicit intransitive choice are consistent with transitive preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21244185     DOI: 10.1037/a0021150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  28 in total

1.  Modeling Viewpoint Shifts in Probabilistic Choice.

Authors:  Tomoya Okubo; Shin-Ichi Mayekawa
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsetsos; Rani Moran; James Moreland; Nick Chater; Marius Usher; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Reported violations of rationality may be aggregation artifacts.

Authors:  Clintin P Davis-Stober; Sanghyuk Park; Nicholas Brown; Michel Regenwetter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Recasting a biologically motivated computational model within a Fechnerian and random utility framework.

Authors:  Clintin P Davis-Stober; Nicholas Brown; Sanghyuk Park; Michel Regenwetter
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.223

5.  Testing Probabilistic Models of Choice using Column Generation.

Authors:  Bart Smeulders; Clintin Davis-Stober; Michel Regenwetter; Frits C R Spieksma
Journal:  Comput Oper Res       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.008

6.  The role of independence and stationarity in probabilistic models of binary choice.

Authors:  Michel Regenwetter; Clintin P Davis-Stober
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2017-10-06

7.  Behavioral variability of choices versus structural inconsistency of preferences.

Authors:  Michel Regenwetter; Clintin P Davis-Stober
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Is Cognitive Impairment Related to Violations of Rationality? A Laboratory Alcohol Intoxication Study Testing Transitivity of Preference.

Authors:  Clintin P Davis-Stober; Denis M McCarthy; Daniel R Cavagnaro; Mason Price; Nicholas Brown; Sanghyuk Park
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2018-07-23

9.  QTest: Quantitative Testing of Theories of Binary Choice.

Authors:  Michel Regenwetter; Clintin P Davis-Stober; Shiau Hong Lim; Ying Guo; Anna Popova; Chris Zwilling; Yun-Shil Cha; William Messner
Journal:  Decisions       Date:  2014-01

10.  Transitivity of odor preferences: constant and particularities in hedonic perception.

Authors:  Gérard Brand; Virginie Haaz; Laurence Jacquot
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.