Literature DB >> 30416247

Testing Probabilistic Models of Choice using Column Generation.

Bart Smeulders1, Clintin Davis-Stober2, Michel Regenwetter3, Frits C R Spieksma4.   

Abstract

In so-called random preference models of probabilistic choice, a decision maker chooses according to an unspecified probability distribution over preference states. The most prominent case arises when preference states are linear orders or weak orders of the choice alternatives. The literature has documented that actually evaluating whether decision makers' observed choices are consistent with such a probabilistic model of choice poses computational difficulties. This severely limits the possible scale of empirical work in behavioral economics and related disciplines. We propose a family of column generation based algorithms for performing such tests. We evaluate our algorithms on various sets of instances. We observe substantial improvements in computation time and conclude that we can efficiently test substantially larger data sets than previously possible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Choice Behavior; Column Generation; Membership Problems; Probabilistic Choice

Year:  2018        PMID: 30416247      PMCID: PMC6224134          DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2018.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Oper Res        ISSN: 0305-0548            Impact factor:   4.008


  8 in total

1.  Testing transitivity of preferences on two-alternative forced choice data.

Authors:  Michel Regenwetter; Jason Dana; Clintin P Davis-Stober
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-13

Review 2.  Quantitative tests of the Perceived Relative Argument Model: comment on Loomes (2010).

Authors:  Ying Guo; Michel Regenwetter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The construct-behavior gap in behavioral decision research: A challenge beyond replicability.

Authors:  Michel Regenwetter; Maria M Robinson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Behavioral variability of choices versus structural inconsistency of preferences.

Authors:  Michel Regenwetter; Clintin P Davis-Stober
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Transitivity of preferences.

Authors:  Michel Regenwetter; Jason Dana; Clintin P Davis-Stober
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  QTest: Quantitative Testing of Theories of Binary Choice.

Authors:  Michel Regenwetter; Clintin P Davis-Stober; Shiau Hong Lim; Ying Guo; Anna Popova; Chris Zwilling; Yun-Shil Cha; William Messner
Journal:  Decisions       Date:  2014-01

7.  Commentary: "Neural signatures of intransitive preferences".

Authors:  Nicholas Brown; Clintin P Davis-Stober; Michel Regenwetter
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Mate choice in fruit flies is rational and adaptive.

Authors:  Devin Arbuthnott; Tatyana Y Fedina; Scott D Pletcher; Daniel E L Promislow
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 17.694

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.