Literature DB >> 29805199

The role of independence and stationarity in probabilistic models of binary choice.

Michel Regenwetter1, Clintin P Davis-Stober2.   

Abstract

After more then 50 years of probabilistic choice modeling in Economics, Marketing, Political Science, Psychology, and related disciplines, theoretical and computational advances give scholars access to a sophisticated array of modeling and inference resources. We review some important, but perhaps often overlooked, properties of major classes of probabilistic choice models. For within-respondent applications, we discuss which models require repeated choices by an individual to be independent and response probabilities to be stationary. We show how some model classes, but not others, are invariant over variable preferences, variable utilities, or variable choice probabilities. These models, but not others, accommodate pooling of responses or averaging of choice proportions within participant when underlying parameters vary across observations. These, but not others, permit pooling/averaging across respondents in the presence of individual differences. We also review the role of independence and stationarity in statistical inference, including for probabilistic choice models that, themselves, do not require those properties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Probabilistic choice models; iid assumptions; modeling heterogeneity; statistical testing

Year:  2017        PMID: 29805199      PMCID: PMC5963291          DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak        ISSN: 0894-3257


  15 in total

1.  Models of ecological rationality: the recognition heuristic.

Authors:  Daniel G Goldstein; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation.

Authors:  Scott D Brown; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The probabilistic nature of preferential choice.

Authors:  Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Stochastic Token Theory

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.223

5.  Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsetsos; Rani Moran; James Moreland; Nick Chater; Marius Usher; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Reported violations of rationality may be aggregation artifacts.

Authors:  Clintin P Davis-Stober; Sanghyuk Park; Nicholas Brown; Michel Regenwetter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Transitivity of preferences.

Authors:  Michel Regenwetter; Jason Dana; Clintin P Davis-Stober
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  QTest: Quantitative Testing of Theories of Binary Choice.

Authors:  Michel Regenwetter; Clintin P Davis-Stober; Shiau Hong Lim; Ying Guo; Anna Popova; Chris Zwilling; Yun-Shil Cha; William Messner
Journal:  Decisions       Date:  2014-01

9.  Assessing individual differences in categorical data.

Authors:  Jared B Smith; William H Batchelder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

10.  Generalized outcome-based strategy classification: comparing deterministic and probabilistic choice models.

Authors:  Benjamin E Hilbig; Morten Moshagen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Cognitive Aging and Tests of Rationality.

Authors:  Sanghyuk Park; Clintin P Davis-Stober; Hope K Snyder; William Messner; Michel Regenwetter
Journal:  Span J Psychol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 1.264

2.  Can news-based economic sentiment predict bubbles in precious metal markets?

Authors:  Aktham Maghyereh; Hussein Abdoh
Journal:  Financ Innov       Date:  2022-04-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.