Literature DB >> 21243714

Spreading chromatin into chemical biology.

C David Allis1, Tom W Muir.   

Abstract

Epigenetics, broadly defined as the inheritance of non-Mendelian phenotypic traits, can be more narrowly defined as heritable alterations in states of gene expression ("on" versus "off") that are not linked to changes in DNA sequence. Moreover, these alterations can persist in the absence of the signals that initiate them, thus suggesting some kind of "memory" to epigenetic forms of regulation. How, for example, during early female mammalian development, is one X chromosome selected to be kept in an active state, while the genetically identical sister X chromosome is "marked" to be inactive, even though they reside in the same nucleus, exposed to the same collection of shared trans-factors? Once X inactivation occurs, how are these contrasting chromatin states maintained and inherited faithfully through subsequent cell divisions? Chromatin states, whether active (euchromatic) or silent (heterochromatic) are established, maintained, and propagated with remarkable precision during normal development and differentiation. However, mistakes made in establishing and maintaining these chromatin states, often executed by a variety of chromatin-remodeling activities, can lead to mis-expression or mis-silencing of critical downstream gene targets with far-reaching implications for human biology and disease, notably cancer. Though chromatin biologists have identified many of the "inputs" that are important for controlling chromatin states, the detailed mechanisms by which these processes work remain largely opaque, in part due to the staggering complexity of the chromatin polymer, the physiologically relevant form of our genome. The primary objective of this article is to serve as a "call to arms" for chemists to contribute to the development of the precision tools needed to answer pressing molecular problems in this rapidly moving field.
Copyright © 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21243714     DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201000761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chembiochem        ISSN: 1439-4227            Impact factor:   3.164


  25 in total

1.  Traceless semisynthesis of a set of histone 3 species bearing specific lysine methylation marks.

Authors:  Zhonglei Chen; Adrian T Grzybowski; Alexander J Ruthenburg
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.164

2.  Targeted Histone Peptides: Insights into the Spatial Regulation of the Methyltransferase PRC2 by using a Surrogate of Heterotypic Chromatin.

Authors:  Zachary Z Brown; Manuel M Müller; Ha Eun Kong; Peter W Lewis; Tom W Muir
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Histone monoubiquitylation position determines specificity and direction of enzymatic cross-talk with histone methyltransferases Dot1L and PRC2.

Authors:  Sarah J Whitcomb; Beat Fierz; Robert K McGinty; Matthew Holt; Takashi Ito; Tom W Muir; C David Allis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Histone fold modifications control nucleosome unwrapping and disassembly.

Authors:  Marek Simon; Justin A North; John C Shimko; Robert A Forties; Michelle B Ferdinand; Mridula Manohar; Meng Zhang; Richard Fishel; Jennifer J Ottesen; Michael G Poirier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Labeling lysine acetyltransferase substrates with engineered enzymes and functionalized cofactor surrogates.

Authors:  Chao Yang; Jiaqi Mi; You Feng; Liza Ngo; Tielong Gao; Leilei Yan; Yujun George Zheng
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 6.  A Structural Perspective on Readout of Epigenetic Histone and DNA Methylation Marks.

Authors:  Dinshaw J Patel
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 7.  Application of the protein semisynthesis strategy to the generation of modified chromatin.

Authors:  Matthew Holt; Tom Muir
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 8.  Application of ChIP-Seq and related techniques to the study of immune function.

Authors:  Daniel L Northrup; Keji Zhao
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 9.  The Bump-and-Hole Tactic: Expanding the Scope of Chemical Genetics.

Authors:  Kabirul Islam
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 8.116

10.  Foxp3+ T-regulatory cells require DNA methyltransferase 1 expression to prevent development of lethal autoimmunity.

Authors:  Liqing Wang; Yujie Liu; Ulf H Beier; Rongxiang Han; Tricia R Bhatti; Tatiana Akimova; Wayne W Hancock
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.