OBJECTIVE: Emerging evidence suggests associations between menopausal hot flashes and cardiovascular risk. However, whether hot flashes are associated with intima media thickness (IMT) or IMT changes over time is unknown. We hypothesized that reported hot flashes would be associated with greater IMT cross-sectionally and with greater IMT progression over 2 years. METHODS: Participants were 432 women aged 45 to 58 years at baseline participating in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) Heart, an ancillary study to the SWAN. Measures at the SWAN Heart baseline and follow-up visit 2 years later included a carotid artery ultrasound, reported hot flashes (past 2 weeks: none, 1-5 d, ≥6 d), and a blood sample for measurement of estradiol. RESULTS: Women reporting hot flashes for 6 days or more in the prior 2 weeks had significantly higher IMT than did women without hot flashes at the baseline (mean [SE] difference, 0.02 [0.01] mm; P=0.03) and follow-up (mean [SE] difference, 0.02 [0.01] mm; P=0.04) visits, controlling for demographic factors and cardiovascular risk factors. Reporting hot flashes at both study visits was associated with higher follow-up IMT relative to reporting hot flashes at neither visit (mean [SE] difference, 0.03 [0.01] mm; P=0.03). Associations between hot flashes and IMT largely remained after adjusting for estradiol. An interaction between hot flashes and obesity status was observed (P=0.05) such that relations between hot flashes and IMT were observed principally among overweight/obese women. Hot flashes were not associated with IMT progression. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide some indication that women reporting hot flashes for 6 days or more in the prior 2 weeks may have higher IMT than do women without hot flashes, particularly for women who are overweight or obese. Further work should determine whether hot flashes mark adverse underlying vascular changes.
OBJECTIVE: Emerging evidence suggests associations between menopausal hot flashes and cardiovascular risk. However, whether hot flashes are associated with intima media thickness (IMT) or IMT changes over time is unknown. We hypothesized that reported hot flashes would be associated with greater IMT cross-sectionally and with greater IMT progression over 2 years. METHODS:Participants were 432 women aged 45 to 58 years at baseline participating in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) Heart, an ancillary study to the SWAN. Measures at the SWAN Heart baseline and follow-up visit 2 years later included a carotid artery ultrasound, reported hot flashes (past 2 weeks: none, 1-5 d, ≥6 d), and a blood sample for measurement of estradiol. RESULTS:Women reporting hot flashes for 6 days or more in the prior 2 weeks had significantly higher IMT than did women without hot flashes at the baseline (mean [SE] difference, 0.02 [0.01] mm; P=0.03) and follow-up (mean [SE] difference, 0.02 [0.01] mm; P=0.04) visits, controlling for demographic factors and cardiovascular risk factors. Reporting hot flashes at both study visits was associated with higher follow-up IMT relative to reporting hot flashes at neither visit (mean [SE] difference, 0.03 [0.01] mm; P=0.03). Associations between hot flashes and IMT largely remained after adjusting for estradiol. An interaction between hot flashes and obesity status was observed (P=0.05) such that relations between hot flashes and IMT were observed principally among overweight/obesewomen. Hot flashes were not associated with IMT progression. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide some indication that women reporting hot flashes for 6 days or more in the prior 2 weeks may have higher IMT than do women without hot flashes, particularly for women who are overweight or obese. Further work should determine whether hot flashes mark adverse underlying vascular changes.
Authors: James H Stein; Claudia E Korcarz; R Todd Hurst; Eva Lonn; Christopher B Kendall; Emile R Mohler; Samer S Najjar; Christopher M Rembold; Wendy S Post Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Jacques E Rossouw; Ross L Prentice; JoAnn E Manson; Lieling Wu; David Barad; Vanessa M Barnabei; Marcia Ko; Andrea Z LaCroix; Karen L Margolis; Marcia L Stefanick Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-04-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Joyce T Bromberger; Karen A Matthews; Laura L Schott; Sarah Brockwell; Nancy E Avis; Howard M Kravitz; Susan A Everson-Rose; Ellen B Gold; MaryFran Sowers; John F Randolph Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2007-02-28 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Pauline M Maki; Lauren L Drogos; Leah H Rubin; Suzanne Banuvar; Lee P Shulman; Stacie E Geller Journal: Menopause Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Rachel P Wildman; Alicia B Colvin; Lynda H Powell; Karen A Matthews; Susan A Everson-Rose; Steven Hollenberg; Janet M Johnston; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell Journal: Menopause Date: 2008 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Rebecca C Thurston; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Susan A Everson-Rose; Rachel Hess; Karen A Matthews Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-09-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gerrie-Cor M Gast; Diederick E Grobbee; Victor J M Pop; Jules J Keyzer; Colette J M Wijnands-van Gent; Göran N Samsioe; Peter M Nilsson; Yvonne T van der Schouw Journal: Hypertension Date: 2008-04-07 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Pauliina Tuomikoski; Pia Ebert; Per-Henrik Groop; Petri Haapalahti; Hanna Hautamäki; Mats Rönnback; Olavi Ylikorkala; Tomi S Mikkola Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: V J Victorino; C Panis; F C Campos; R C Cayres; A N Colado-Simão; S R Oliveira; A C S A Herrera; A L Cecchini; R Cecchini Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2012-05-28
Authors: Lisa Gallicchio; Susan R Miller; Judith Kiefer; Teresa Greene; Howard A Zacur; Jodi A Flaws Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Laura B Harrington; Marc Blondon; Mary Cushman; Andrew M Kaunitz; Jacques E Rossouw; Matthew A Allison; Lisa W Martin; Karen C Johnson; Jan Rosing; Nancy F Woods; Andrea Z LaCroix; Susan R Heckbert; Barbara McKnight; Nicholas L Smith Journal: Menopause Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Elizabeth A Jackson; Samar R El Khoudary; Sybil L Crawford; Karen Matthews; Hadine Joffe; Claudia Chae; Rebecca C Thurston Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Rebecca C Thurston; Samar R El Khoudary; Ping Guo Tepper; Elizabeth A Jackson; Hadine Joffe; Hsiang-Yu Chen; Karen A Matthews Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jennifer L Gordon; David R Rubinow; Rebecca C Thurston; Julia Paulson; Peter J Schmidt; Susan S Girdler Journal: Menopause Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Alexis Nasr; Karen A Matthews; Maria M Brooks; Daniel S McConnell; Trevor J Orchard; Jeffrey Billheimer; Daniel J Rader; Samar R El Khoudary Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 4.766