BACKGROUND: Although evidence suggests adverse vascular changes among women with hot flashes, it is unknown whether hot flashes are associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to examine relations between menopausal hot flashes and indices of subclinical cardiovascular disease. We hypothesized that women with hot flashes would show reduced flow-mediated dilation and greater coronary artery and aortic calcification compared with women without hot flashes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation Heart Study (2001 to 2003) is an ancillary study to the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation, a community-based cohort study. Participants were 492 women (35% black, 65% white) 45 to 58 years of age who were free of clinical cardiovascular disease and had a uterus and at least 1 ovary. Measures included a brachial artery ultrasound to assess flow-mediated dilation, electron beam tomography to assess coronary artery and aortic calcification, reported hot flashes (any/none, previous 2 weeks), and a blood sample for measurement of estradiol concentrations. Cross-sectional associations were evaluated with linear regression and partial proportional odds models. Hot flashes were associated with significantly lower flow-mediated dilation (beta=-1.01; SE, 0.41; P=0.01) and greater coronary artery (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 2.12) and aortic (odds ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 2.19) calcification in age- and race-adjusted models. Significant associations between hot flashes and flow-mediated dilation (beta=-0.97; SE, 0.44; P=0.03) and aortic calcification (odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 2.49) remained in models adjusted for cardiovascular disease risk factors and estradiol. CONCLUSIONS: Women with hot flashes had reduced flow-mediated dilation and greater aortic calcification. Hot flashes may mark adverse underlying vascular changes among midlife women.
BACKGROUND: Although evidence suggests adverse vascular changes among women with hot flashes, it is unknown whether hot flashes are associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to examine relations between menopausal hot flashes and indices of subclinical cardiovascular disease. We hypothesized that women with hot flashes would show reduced flow-mediated dilation and greater coronary artery and aortic calcification compared with women without hot flashes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation Heart Study (2001 to 2003) is an ancillary study to the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation, a community-based cohort study. Participants were 492 women (35% black, 65% white) 45 to 58 years of age who were free of clinical cardiovascular disease and had a uterus and at least 1 ovary. Measures included a brachial artery ultrasound to assess flow-mediated dilation, electron beam tomography to assess coronary artery and aortic calcification, reported hot flashes (any/none, previous 2 weeks), and a blood sample for measurement of estradiol concentrations. Cross-sectional associations were evaluated with linear regression and partial proportional odds models. Hot flashes were associated with significantly lower flow-mediated dilation (beta=-1.01; SE, 0.41; P=0.01) and greater coronary artery (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 2.12) and aortic (odds ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 2.19) calcification in age- and race-adjusted models. Significant associations between hot flashes and flow-mediated dilation (beta=-0.97; SE, 0.44; P=0.03) and aortic calcification (odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 2.49) remained in models adjusted for cardiovascular disease risk factors and estradiol. CONCLUSIONS:Women with hot flashes had reduced flow-mediated dilation and greater aortic calcification. Hot flashes may mark adverse underlying vascular changes among midlife women.
Authors: Mary C Corretti; Todd J Anderson; Emelia J Benjamin; David Celermajer; Francois Charbonneau; Mark A Creager; John Deanfield; Helmut Drexler; Marie Gerhard-Herman; David Herrington; Patrick Vallance; Joseph Vita; Robert Vogel Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-01-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Vanessa M Barnabei; Deborah Grady; Dale W Stovall; Jane A Cauley; Feng Lin; Cynthia A Stuenkel; Marcia L Stefanick; James H Pickar Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Joyce T Bromberger; Susan F Assmann; Nancy E Avis; Miriam Schocken; Howard M Kravitz; Adriana Cordal Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2003-08-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Howard M Kravitz; Patricia A Ganz; Joyce Bromberger; Lynda H Powell; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Peter M Meyer Journal: Menopause Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Jacques E Rossouw; Garnet L Anderson; Ross L Prentice; Andrea Z LaCroix; Charles Kooperberg; Marcia L Stefanick; Rebecca D Jackson; Shirley A A Beresford; Barbara V Howard; Karen C Johnson; Jane Morley Kotchen; Judith Ockene Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-07-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: B Delia Johnson; Kathleen M Dwyer; Frank Z Stanczyk; Vera Bittner; Sarah L Berga; Glenn D Braunstein; Ricardo Azziz; YuChing Yang; Georgina E Hale; C Noel Bairey Merz Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Alison J Huang; Leslee L Subak; Rena Wing; Delia Smith West; Alexandra L Hernandez; Judy Macer; Deborah Grady Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-07-12
Authors: Sarah H Lindsey; Ariel S da Silva; Mauro S Silva; Mark C Chappell Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-05-14 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Rebecca C Thurston; Samar R El Khoudary; Ping Guo Tepper; Elizabeth A Jackson; Hadine Joffe; Hsiang-Yu Chen; Karen A Matthews Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jennifer L Gordon; David R Rubinow; Rebecca C Thurston; Julia Paulson; Peter J Schmidt; Susan S Girdler Journal: Menopause Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Alexis Nasr; Karen A Matthews; Maria M Brooks; Daniel S McConnell; Trevor J Orchard; Jeffrey Billheimer; Daniel J Rader; Samar R El Khoudary Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 4.766