Elizabeth A Jackson1, Samar R El Khoudary2, Sybil L Crawford3, Karen Matthews2,4, Hadine Joffe5, Claudia Chae6, Rebecca C Thurston2,4. 1. 1 Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan. 2. 2 Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. 3 Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, University of Massachusetts , Worcester, Massachusetts. 4. 4 Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. 5 Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute , Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. 6 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are highly prevalent among midlife women and have been associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the association between VMS frequency and risk factors such as hypertension (HTN) remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined VMS frequency and blood pressure (BP) among 2839 participants of the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), a multiethnic, prospective, study of women enrolled from seven U.S. sites between November 1995 and October 1997. Women were age 42-52, with no history of CVD, and not postmenopausal at baseline. VMS was defined by the number of days a woman reported VMS over the 2-week period before each annual visit. Frequent VMS was defined as ≥6 days of VMS; less frequent VMS was defined 1-5 days of symptoms with asymptomatic women the reference group. BP was measured at each visit in addition to demographic and clinic factors. RESULTS: At baseline, 298 women reported frequent VMS, 794 less frequent VMS and 1747 no VMS. More frequent baseline VMS was associated with higher BP. Compared to no VMS, baseline VMS was associated with HTN (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]; 1.14-1.88 for infrequent VMS, and OR 1.40, (95% CI; 0.97-2.02 for frequent VMS). Risk for incident pre-HTN or HTN during follow-up was increased among women with frequent VMS (hazard ratio of 1.39, 95% CI; 1.09-1.79) after adjustment for multiple covariates. CONCLUSION: Women with VMS may be more likely to develop HTN compared to women without VMS. Further research related to VMS including frequency of symptoms is warranted.
BACKGROUND: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are highly prevalent among midlife women and have been associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the association between VMS frequency and risk factors such as hypertension (HTN) remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined VMS frequency and blood pressure (BP) among 2839 participants of the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), a multiethnic, prospective, study of women enrolled from seven U.S. sites between November 1995 and October 1997. Women were age 42-52, with no history of CVD, and not postmenopausal at baseline. VMS was defined by the number of days a woman reported VMS over the 2-week period before each annual visit. Frequent VMS was defined as ≥6 days of VMS; less frequent VMS was defined 1-5 days of symptoms with asymptomatic women the reference group. BP was measured at each visit in addition to demographic and clinic factors. RESULTS: At baseline, 298 women reported frequent VMS, 794 less frequent VMS and 1747 no VMS. More frequent baseline VMS was associated with higher BP. Compared to no VMS, baseline VMS was associated with HTN (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]; 1.14-1.88 for infrequent VMS, and OR 1.40, (95% CI; 0.97-2.02 for frequent VMS). Risk for incident pre-HTN or HTN during follow-up was increased among women with frequent VMS (hazard ratio of 1.39, 95% CI; 1.09-1.79) after adjustment for multiple covariates. CONCLUSION:Women with VMS may be more likely to develop HTN compared to women without VMS. Further research related to VMS including frequency of symptoms is warranted.
Authors: Noha H Farag; Richard A Nelesen; Barbara L Parry; Jose S Loredo; Joel E Dimsdale; Paul J Mills Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rony Lahoud; Michael Howe; Sangeetha M Krishnan; Sibin Zacharias; Elizabeth A Jackson Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Ellen B Gold; Alicia Colvin; Nancy Avis; Joyce Bromberger; Gail A Greendale; Lynda Powell; Barbara Sternfeld; Karen Matthews Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jacques E Rossouw; Ross L Prentice; JoAnn E Manson; Lieling Wu; David Barad; Vanessa M Barnabei; Marcia Ko; Andrea Z LaCroix; Karen L Margolis; Marcia L Stefanick Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-04-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Barbara Sternfeld; Hua Wang; Charles P Quesenberry; Barbara Abrams; Susan A Everson-Rose; Gail A Greendale; Karen A Matthews; Javier I Torrens; MaryFran Sowers Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Gerrie-Cor M Gast; Diederick E Grobbee; Victor J M Pop; Jules J Keyzer; Colette J M Wijnands-van Gent; Göran N Samsioe; Peter M Nilsson; Yvonne T van der Schouw Journal: Hypertension Date: 2008-04-07 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Anna C O'Kelly; Erin D Michos; Chrisandra L Shufelt; Jane V Vermunt; Margo B Minissian; Odayme Quesada; Graeme N Smith; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Vesna D Garovic; Samar R El Khoudary; Michael C Honigberg Journal: Circ Res Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Fiona C Baker; Mohamad Forouzanfar; Aimée Goldstone; Stephanie A Claudatos; Harold Javitz; John Trinder; Massimiliano De Zambotti Journal: Sleep Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Saad Samargandy; Karen A Matthews; Maria M Brooks; Emma Barinas-Mitchell; Jared W Magnani; Rebecca C Thurston; Samar R El Khoudary Journal: Circ Res Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Angela H E M Maas; Giuseppe Rosano; Renata Cifkova; Alaide Chieffo; Dorenda van Dijken; Haitham Hamoda; Vijay Kunadian; Ellen Laan; Irene Lambrinoudaki; Kate Maclaran; Nick Panay; John C Stevenson; Mick van Trotsenburg; Peter Collins Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2021-03-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Samar R El Khoudary; Gail Greendale; Sybil L Crawford; Nancy E Avis; Maria M Brooks; Rebecca C Thurston; Carrie Karvonen-Gutierrez; L Elaine Waetjen; Karen Matthews Journal: Menopause Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Stephanie S Faubion; Amanda King; Andrea G Kattah; Carol L Kuhle; Richa Sood; Juliana M Kling; Kristin C Mara; Ekta Kapoor Journal: Menopause Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 3.310