Literature DB >> 33826058

Quality of life following adult veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review.

E R Kurniawati1, V G H Rutjens2, N P A Vranken2, T S R Delnoij3,4, R Lorusso2,5, I C C van der Horst3,5, J G Maessen2,5, P W Weerwind2,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) has been used successfully for the past decade in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) refractory to conventional ventilatory support. However, knowledge of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in VV-ECMO patients is still limited. Thus, this study aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the HRQoL following VV-ECMO support in ARDS patients.
METHODS: A systematic search was performed on PubMed and Web of Science databases from January 1st, 2009 to October 19th, 2020. Studies reporting on HRQoL following VV-ECMO for ARDS in adults were included. Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality.
RESULTS: Eight studies were eligible for inclusion, consisting of seven observational studies and one randomized controlled trial (total N = 441). All eight studies had a quantitative design and reported 265 VV-ECMO survivors to have a reduced HRQoL compared to a generally healthy population. Follow-up time varied between six months to three years. Additionally, only four studies (total N = 335) compared the HRQoL of VV-ECMO (N = 159) to conventionally treated survivors (N = 176), with one study showing a significantly better HRQoL in VV-ECMO survivors, while three studies were stating comparable HRQoL across groups. Notably, most survivors in these studies appeared to experience varying degrees of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
CONCLUSIONS: ARDS survivors supported by VV-ECMO have a decline in HRQoL and suffered from physical and psychological impairments. This HRQoL reduction is comparable or even better to the HRQoL in conventionally treated ARDS survivors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Adult; Health-related quality of life; Veno-venous extracorporeal life support; Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33826058     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02834-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  41 in total

1.  Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries.

Authors:  Giacomo Bellani; John G Laffey; Tài Pham; Eddy Fan; Laurent Brochard; Andres Esteban; Luciano Gattinoni; Frank van Haren; Anders Larsson; Daniel F McAuley; Marco Ranieri; Gordon Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Hermann Wrigge; Arthur S Slutsky; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Extracorporeal Life Support in Adult Patients: A Global Perspective of the Last Decade.

Authors:  Eva R Kurniawati; Patrick W Weerwind
Journal:  Dimens Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2019 May/Jun

3.  Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference?

Authors:  Milad Karimi; John Brazier
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Patients With COVID-19 in Severe Respiratory Failure.

Authors:  Asif K Mustafa; Philip J Alexander; Devang J Joshi; Deborah R Tabachnick; Chadrick A Cross; Pat S Pappas; Antone J Tatooles
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 5.  Pharmacotherapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Hira Shafeeq; Ishaq Lat
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 6.  Pharmacological treatments in ARDS; a state-of-the-art update.

Authors:  Andrew James Boyle; Rob Mac Sweeney; Daniel Francis McAuley
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 7.  Adult venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe respiratory failure: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Ayan Sen; Hannelisa E Callisen; Cory M Alwardt; Joel S Larson; Amelia A Lowell; Stacy L Libricz; Pritee Tarwade; Bhavesh M Patel; Harish Ramakrishna
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

8.  Application of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Failure: Situations, Issues, and Trends.

Authors:  Xu-Yan Li; Bing Sun
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-03-05       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19-related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Worth the Effort?

Authors:  Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz; Alexandra Monnier; Marc Puyraveau; Stephanie Perrier; Pierre-Olivier Ludes; Anne Olland; Paul-Michel Mertes; Francis Schneider; Julie Helms; Ferhat Meziani
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 10.  Current and evolving standards of care for patients with ARDS.

Authors:  Mario Menk; Elisa Estenssoro; Sarina K Sahetya; Ary Serpa Neto; Pratik Sinha; Arthur S Slutsky; Charlotte Summers; Takeshi Yoshida; Thomas Bein; Niall D Ferguson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  1 in total

1.  One-Year Functional, Cognitive, and Psychological Outcomes Following the Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Venkatakrishna Rajajee; Christopher Mon-Chee Fung; Katharine Surella Seagly; Pauline Kyonsook Park; Krishnan Raghavendran; David Antonio Machado-Aranda; Jonathan William Scott; Matthew Joseph Delano; Ashraf Shaaban Abdel Aziz Abou El Ela; Jonathan William Haft; Craig Andrew Williamson; Jakob Israel McSparron; Ross Blank; Lena Marie Napolitano
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-09-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.