Literature DB >> 21240524

Surface quality of human corneal lenticules after femtosecond laser surgery for myopia comparing different laser parameters.

Kathleen S Kunert1, Marcus Blum, Gernot I W Duncker, Rabea Sietmann, Jens Heichel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine the surface characteristics of human corneal lenticules after femtosecond laser surgery for myopia.
METHODS: The Carl Zeiss Meditec AG VisuMax® femtosecond laser system was used for refractive correction called Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction on 24 myopic eyes. The surface regularity on the refractive corneal lenticules recovered was evaluated by assessing scanning electron microscopy images using an established scoring system. Three different energy levels 150, 180, and 195 nJ were compared (n = 8 in each group).
RESULTS: Surface irregularities were caused by tissue bridges, cavitation bubbles, or scratches. The surface regularity index (R(2) = 0.74) decreased as pulse energy increased. The average surface regularity score obtained was 7.5 for 150 nJ, 7.25 for 180 nJ, and 6.25 for 195 nJ.
CONCLUSIONS: The human corneal lenticules created with the VisuMax® femtosecond laser system are of predictable, good-quality surface. This study shows the influence of pulse energy on surface regularity in human eyes. Further studies should focus on optimization of laser parameters as well as surgical technique to improve the regularity of the corneal stromal bed and so make the advantages of the femtosecond laser technology over conventional techniques clearer in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21240524     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-010-1578-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  27 in total

1.  Flap dimensions created with the IntraLase FS laser.

Authors:  Perry S Binder
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal flap cuts: morphology, accuracy, and histopathology.

Authors:  Mike P Holzer; Tanja M Rabsilber; Gerd U Auffarth
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Comparative study of stromal bed quality by using mechanical, IntraLase femtosecond laser 15- and 30-kHz microkeratomes.

Authors:  Melvin A Sarayba; Teresa S Ignacio; Perry S Binder; Dan B Tran
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Quantitative assessment of corneal wound healing following IntraLASIK using in vivo confocal microscopy.

Authors:  James P McCulley; W Matthew Petroll
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2008

5.  Effect of decreasing surface and interface irregularities after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis on optical and functional outcomes.

Authors:  P Vinciguerra; M Azzolini; P Airaghi; P Radice; V De Molfetta
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Assessment of keratocyte activation following LASIK with flap creation using the IntraLase FS60 laser.

Authors:  W Matthew Petroll; R Wayne Bowman; H Dwight Cavanagh; Steven M Verity; V Vinod Mootha; James P McCulley
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Comparison of the corneal response to laser in situ keratomileusis with flap creation using the FS15 and FS30 femtosecond lasers: clinical and confocal microscopy findings.

Authors:  Michael Y Hu; James P McCulley; H Dwight Cavanagh; R Wayne Bowman; Steven M Verity; V Vinod Mootha; W Matthew Petroll
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Comparative micromorphologic in vitro porcine study of IntraLase and Femto LDV femtosecond lasers.

Authors:  Omid Kermani; Uwe Oberheide
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Biomechanical effects of femtosecond and microkeratome-based flap creation: prospective contralateral examination of two patients.

Authors:  Ronald R Krueger; William J Dupps
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  A 60 kHz IntraLase femtosecond laser creates a smoother LASIK stromal bed surface compared to a Zyoptix XP mechanical microkeratome in human donor eyes.

Authors:  Melvin A Sarayba; Teresa S Ignacio; Dan B Tran; Perry S Binder
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  16 in total

1.  Relationship between femtosecond laser parameters and quality of the corneal stromal bed surface.

Authors:  Zhen-Yong Zhang; Matthew R Hoffman
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Reply to the letter by Zhang and Hoffman: Relationship between femtosecond laser parameters and quality of the corneal stromal bed surface.

Authors:  Kathleen S Kunert; Marcus Blum; Gernot I W Duncker; Jens Heichel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  A microscopic study of the corneal stromal lenticules extracted during femtosecond laser-assisted small incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Yewei Yin; Tu Hu; Aiqun Xiang; Yanyan Fu; Yang Zhao; Xiaoying Wu; Xiaoying Wu; Dan Wen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  [Scanning electron microscopic investigations of cutting edge quality in lamellar keratotomy using the Wavelight femtosecond laser (FS-200) : What influence do spot distance and an additional tunnel have?]

Authors:  T Hammer; T Höche; J Heichel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Enhancement of refractive outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction via tear-film control.

Authors:  Il Hwan Koh; Kyoung Yul Seo; Seong Bae Park; Hun Yang; InSik Kim; Sang Min Nam
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Comparative study of objective visual quality between FS-LASIK and SMART in myopia.

Authors:  Yuan Wu; Yue Huang; Shu-Han Wang; Gui-Qin Wang; Ao-Miao Yu; Shao-Zhen Zhao; Rui-Hua Wei; Rui-Bo Yang; Chen Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Cornea lenticule viability and structural integrity after refractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx) and cryopreservation.

Authors:  Karim Mohamed-Noriega; Kah-Peng Toh; Rebekah Poh; Deepashree Balehosur; Andri Riau; Hla M Htoon; Gary S L Peh; Shyam S Chaurasia; Donald T Tan; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 2.367

8.  Time course of optical quality and intraocular scattering after refractive lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Kazutaka Kamiya; Kimiya Shimizu; Akihito Igarashi; Hidenaga Kobashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The morphology of corneal cap and its relation to refractive outcomes in femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with anterior segment optical coherence tomography observation.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Peijun Yao; Meiyan Li; Zhi Chen; Yang Shen; Zhennan Zhao; Zimei Zhou; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Efficacy, predictability, and safety of small incision lenticule extraction: 6-months prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jae Ryun Kim; Hyung Bin Hwang; Su Joung Mun; Young Taek Chung; Hyun Seung Kim
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.