Literature DB >> 17397742

Comparison of the corneal response to laser in situ keratomileusis with flap creation using the FS15 and FS30 femtosecond lasers: clinical and confocal microscopy findings.

Michael Y Hu1, James P McCulley, H Dwight Cavanagh, R Wayne Bowman, Steven M Verity, V Vinod Mootha, W Matthew Petroll.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the response of the cornea to laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with flap creation using the IntraLase FS15 or FS30 femtosecond laser (IntraLase Corp.).
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
METHODS: Twenty-three patients (31 eyes) who had LASIK with flap creation using the FS15 or FS30 laser were assessed by clinical examination and confocal microscopy in a nonrandomized parallel treatment group comparative trial. Eight FS15 patients (15 eyes) were examined preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively, and 14 FS30 patients (15 eyes) were examined 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: No patient in either group had clinically significant flap interface haze. One FS15 eye and 1 FS30 eye had significant keratocyte activation at the flap interface. The mean difference between the actual flap thickness and intended flap thickness was 16.8 microm +/- 11.1 (SD) and 13.9 +/- 7.1 microm in the FS15 group and FS30 group, respectively (P = .49). The mean measured interface reflectivity was 156.4 +/- 88.6 confocal backscatter units (CBU) and 104.8 +/- 91.2 CBU, respectively (P = .15). The mean density of interface particles was 21.4 +/- 14.8 particles/mm(2) in the FS15 group and 11.0 +/- 7.1 particles/mm(2) in the FS30 group (P<.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Both the FS15 and FS30 lasers provided more reproducible flap thickness and fewer interface particles than previously observed using microkeratomes. The response of corneal keratocytes to intra-LASIK was reduced compared with previous results in which higher raster energies were used. Compared with the FS15, there was an apparent reduction in overall interface reflectivity and fewer interface particles with the FS30 laser.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17397742     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.12.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  8 in total

1.  Simulation of the temperature increase in human cadaver retina during direct illumination by 150-kHz femtosecond laser pulses.

Authors:  Hui Sun; Nora Hosszufalusi; Eric R Mikula; Tibor Juhasz
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Quantitative assessment of corneal wound healing following IntraLASIK using in vivo confocal microscopy.

Authors:  James P McCulley; W Matthew Petroll
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2008

3.  Surface quality of human corneal lenticules after femtosecond laser surgery for myopia comparing different laser parameters.

Authors:  Kathleen S Kunert; Marcus Blum; Gernot I W Duncker; Rabea Sietmann; Jens Heichel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Interface quality of different corneal lamellar-cut depths for femtosecond laser-assisted lamellar anterior keratoplasty.

Authors:  Chenxing Zhang; Matthew Bald; Maolong Tang; Yan Li; David Huang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Assessment of keratocyte activation following LASIK with flap creation using the IntraLase FS60 laser.

Authors:  W Matthew Petroll; R Wayne Bowman; H Dwight Cavanagh; Steven M Verity; V Vinod Mootha; James P McCulley
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Repeatability of layered corneal pachymetry with the artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound arc-scanner.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe; Ronald H Silverman; D Jackson Coleman
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Corneal response to femtosecond laser photodisruption in the rabbit.

Authors:  Naoyuki Morishige; Anna Kesler-Diaz; Andrew J Wahlert; Ronald M Kurtz; Tibor Juhasz; Melvin Sarayba; James V Jester
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  In vivo evaluation of DSAEK interface with scanning-laser confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Giulio Ferrari; Verena Reichegger; Luca Ludergnani; Elisabetta Delfini; Claudio Macaluso
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.209

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.