Literature DB >> 28578458

Coronal plane trunk asymmetry is associated with whole-body sagittal alignment in healthy young adolescents before pubertal peak growth.

Mieke Dolphens1, Andry Vleeming2,3, René Castelein4, Guy Vanderstraeten2,5, Tom Schlösser4, Frank Plasschaert6, Lieven Danneels2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate coronal plane trunk asymmetry (TA) and its association with sagittal postural alignment in healthy subjects before pubertal peak growth.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional baseline study, 1190 healthy pre-peak growth velocity subjects were included. Coronal plane TA was evaluated using back surface topography. Whole-body sagittal alignment (previously validated and objectively classified as neutral, sway-back or leaning-forward) and sagittal spinopelvic profile (trunk lean, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, sacral inclination and length of the posteriorly inclined thoracolumbar segment) were determined, as were height, proportion of trunk to body length, body mass index, generalized joint laxity, and handedness.
RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis yielded overall sagittal posture class to be independently associated with coronal plane TA: having a leaning-forward posture associated with a nearly three times higher odds of coronal TA (p < 0.001) compared to neutrals. A sway-back was 2.2 times more likely to show TA (p = 0.016) than a neutral, yet only in boys. Significant associations with coronal TA were also found for trunk lean, thoracic kyphosis and body mass index. These correlations, however, were gender and posture class specific. The spinal region where asymmetry is seen, varies according to the whole-body sagittal alignment type: primary thoracic curves were the most frequent in leaning-forwards, whereas primary curves in the lumbar or declive thoracolumbar segment were the most common in sway-backs.
CONCLUSIONS: In immature spines without known scoliosis, coronal plane TA is associated with whole-body sagittal alignment. It is more often seen in non-neutral than neutral sagittal posture types. Whether adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is related with postural characteristics before pubertal growth peak, should be addressed in future prospective studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Growth and development; Postural balance; Posture; Scoliosis; Spinal curvatures

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28578458     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5156-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  36 in total

1.  Sagittal standing posture and its association with spinal pain: a school-based epidemiological study of 1196 Flemish adolescents before age at peak height velocity.

Authors:  Mieke Dolphens; Barbara Cagnie; Pascal Coorevits; Guy Vanderstraeten; Greet Cardon; Roseline Dʼhooge; Lieven Danneels
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Trunk asymmetries in a Belgian school population.

Authors:  M Vercauteren; M Van Beneden; R Verplaetse; P Croene; D Uyttendaele; R Verdonk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Posteriorly directed shear loads and disc degeneration affect the torsional stiffness of spinal motion segments: a biomechanical modeling study.

Authors:  Jasper Homminga; Anne M Lehr; Gerdine J M Meijer; Michiel M A Janssen; Tom P C Schlösser; Gijsbertus J Verkerke; René M Castelein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The role of dorsal shear forces in the pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis--a hypothesis.

Authors:  René M Castelein; Jaap H van Dieën; Theo H Smit
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Analysis of preexistent vertebral rotation in the normal infantile, juvenile, and adolescent spine.

Authors:  Michiel M A Janssen; Jan-Willem M Kouwenhoven; Tom P C Schlösser; Max A Viergever; Lambertus W Bartels; René M Castelein; Koen L Vincken
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; Jack C Y Cheng; Aina Danielsson; Jose A Morcuende
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Trunk asymmetry, posture, growth, and risk of scoliosis. A three-year follow-up of Finnish prepubertal school children.

Authors:  M Nissinen; M Heliövaara; J Seitsamo; M Poussa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity.

Authors:  I A Stokes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey.

Authors:  T J Cole; M C Bellizzi; K M Flegal; W H Dietz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06

10.  Intra- and interday reliability of spine rasterstereography.

Authors:  Laura Guidetti; Valerio Bonavolontà; Alessandro Tito; Victor M Reis; Maria Chiara Gallotta; Carlo Baldari
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the association between isolated musculoskeletal hypermobility and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Clare Shere; Emma M Clark
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  The odontoid-CSVL distance in a global population of asymptomatic volunteers: normative values and implications for spinal coronal alignment.

Authors:  Scott L Zuckerman; Zeeshan M Sardar; Christopher S Lai; Gerard F Marciano; Mena G Kerolus; Ian A Buchanan; Alex S Ha; Meghan Cerpa; Michael P Kelly; Stéphane Bourret; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Hee-Kit Wong; Gabriel Liu; Hwee Weng Dennis Hey; Hend Riahi; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of Spinal Curvatures in the Sagittal Plane, as Well as Body Height and Mass in Polish Children and Adolescents Examined in the Late 1950s and in the Early 2000s.

Authors:  Mirosław Mrozkowiak; Katarzyna Walicka-Cupryś; Grzegorz Magoń
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-06-30

4.  Trunk and craniofacial asymmetry are not associated in the general population: a cross-sectional study of 1029 adolescents.

Authors:  Chiara Arienti; Jorge Hugo Villafañe; Sabrina Donzelli; Fabio Zaina; Riccardo Buraschi; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.175

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.